Skip to main content
Tenders

Comprehensive supply of electricity for the State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw – Arsenal building 2026-2027

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00167339/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Warszawski stołeczny, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Warszawski stołeczny
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€1,487,473
Avg. Bids
0.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
16,277 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Comprehensive supply of electricity for the State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw – Arsenal building 2026-2027

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The supply (purchase and distribution) of electricity will be carried out for the building of the National Archaeological Museum in Warsaw (PMA) at ul. Długa 52 in Warsaw.
--PMA has two ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION POINTS (PPE).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de88de-84bf-f40d-056e-e50001aa9df1.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for the comprehensive supply of electricity to the State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw for the Arsenal building in 2026-2027.

formularze.docxDOC
formularze.docx

This document contains the offer form and a declaration of meeting participation conditions and absence of exclusion grounds for the tender regarding the comprehensive supply of electricity for the National Archaeological Museum in Warsaw.

SWZ na strone.pdfPDF
SWZ na strone.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the comprehensive supply of electricity to the State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw for the years 2026-2027.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear documentation and common e-procurement practices, but lacks details on evaluation criteria and financing, and does not emphasize sustainability.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a CPV code and a clear procedure type. The deadline is provided, although its reasonableness for the scope is not fully assessable without more context on submission complexity. No explicit disputes are mentioned. The use of e-procurement aligns with regulatory expectations.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear and concise. The core requirement of electricity supply is well-defined, including the location and estimated consumption range. The attached documents, such as the SWZ, are expected to provide further details on requirements.

Completeness70/100

Essential information like the organization, title, reference, and deadline is present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the specific details of technical and financial requirements are missing from the provided text, likely residing within the attached documents.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which enhances transparency. Key information like the organization and location is disclosed. Requirements do not appear to be tailored to specific companies based on the provided text. The lack of disclosed evaluation criteria could be a concern for fairness if not elaborated in the SWZ.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is designated as e-procurement, which is a positive step. However, the 'contract start date' is not explicitly stated. Information regarding financing sources is absent, and while the duration is 12 months, this could be clarified if it pertains to the contract start date. The 'No e-submission' flag from the analysis is contradictory to 'E-Procurement' characteristic and requires clarification in the actual tender process.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The dates are logical and within a reasonable timeframe. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The provided information is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not mention any specific requirements related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of explicit focus on these sustainability dimensions.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social aspects

Strengths

Clear title and description
E-Procurement used
CPV code provided
Key documents attached and analyzed

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly within the tender documents.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline