Skip to main content
Tenders

Supply of cancellous bone - repeat

Open
Deadline
7 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00172747/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Warmińsko-Mazurskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Warmińsko-Mazurskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€57,338
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
78%
293,505 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of cancellous bone - repeat

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b1d-7b3d-4c8d-5fad-950001e70f39.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the supply of spongy bone, with the Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny in Olsztyn as the contracting authority, and offers to be submitted electronically by April 3, 2026.

20TP SWZ.pdfPDF
20TP SWZ.pdf -- 684.1 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for spongy bone supply is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks transparency in financial details and evaluation criteria, and has a potentially short submission deadline.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and a clear contracting authority. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could pose procedural challenges. The deadline of 7 days is very short, potentially impacting legal compliance regarding reasonable timelines.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the CPV code is provided. Key documents like the offer form, price form, and draft contract are attached, contributing to clarity. However, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria makes it unclear how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, and deadline. Six tender documents are available, with some content summarized. However, the estimated value and contract duration are not disclosed, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The availability of multiple documents, including a draft contract, is positive. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of specified objective evaluation criteria could lead to perceived unfairness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is a positive for practical submission. However, the very short submission deadline (7 days) significantly impacts practicality. The absence of disclosed financing information and contract duration also reduces practical clarity for potential bidders.

Potentially too short submission deadline
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is provided, and the status is active. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender focuses solely on the supply of spongy bone without any sustainability considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

E-Procurement enabled
Clear CPV code provided
Multiple tender documents available
Active status and reference number

Concerns

Very short submission deadline
Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Extend the submission deadline to allow adequate time for preparation.
2. Disclose the estimated value and contract duration for greater transparency.
3. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline