Skip to main content
Tenders

Development and management plan for the park of the manor "Villa Hochheim" to ensure sustainable territory management

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168485
Value
€21,330
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
March 17, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€21,330
Duration
8 months
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development and management plan for the park of the manor "Villa Hochheim" to ensure sustainable territory management

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Offers must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-01T10:00:00.
--Offers must be submitted in Latvian.
--Bidders must confirm understanding of tender requirements and commitment to fulfilling them via the provided application form.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as per Latvian Public Procurement Law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered entities.
--Bidders must possess the necessary licenses and permits to operate in Latvia.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must demonstrate experience in developing and managing similar park development and management plans.
--Bidders must provide a detailed methodology for the development of the park plan.
--Bidders must outline their proposed management strategy for the park.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must demonstrate sufficient financial stability to undertake the project.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168485_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260317155232.pdf -- 106.0 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the development and management plan of the "Villa Hochheim" park in Talsi municipality, including eligibility criteria, required documents, and specific conditions for bidders.

Nolikums un tā pielikumi TNP 2026/33DOC
1.pielikums_Pretendenta_pieteikums_TNP_2026_3... -- 19.6 KB

This document contains a bidder's application form for the procurement of a park development and management plan for "Villa Hochheim", confirming understanding of the tender requirements and commitment to fulfilling them.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender TNP 2026/33, which is for the development and management plan of the "Villa Hochheim" park, with a deadline for submission of offers on April 1, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable value, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and accessibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, a proper CPV code, and no apparent disputes. Deadlines are reasonable within the context of the tender's timeline. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the information provided.

Clarity80/100

The description of the park development and management plan is clear. While specific evaluation criteria are missing, the AI-extracted requirements are well-defined, indicating a good level of clarity regarding what is expected from bidders in terms of technical and submission aspects. The conditions for bidders are generally clear.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. Three tender documents are provided, with summaries indicating they cover requirements and application forms. However, the crucial evaluation criteria are not specified, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender uses an open procedure and e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag indicates that not all documents may be fully accessible without potential barriers, which could limit participation. The requirements are objective and not tailored to specific companies.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is active with a clear contract start date implicitly linked to the opening date. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and while e-submission is implied by e-procurement, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks suggests a potential disconnect or lack of explicit confirmation of the submission method within the provided text. The duration is specified.

No e-submission (flagged in checks)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The timeline from reveal date to submission deadline and opening date is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The title mentions 'ilgtspējīgas teritorijas pārvaldības' (sustainable territory management), implying a focus on sustainability. However, there are no specific requirements for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation mentioned in the AI-extracted requirements, and it is not flagged as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of the service required
Open procurement procedure
E-procurement characteristics
Reasonable deadlines and value disclosure
Consistent data population

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Lack of explicit detail on sustainability aspects beyond the title
Potential issues with e-submission confirmation

Recommendations

1. Publish clear evaluation criteria within the tender documents.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully and easily accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Explicitly detail any specific green, social, or innovation requirements to align with the sustainability aspect mentioned in the title.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline