Skip to main content
Tenders

Supply of fuel chips for the needs of the Lejasciems boiler house

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
167634
Value
€42,000
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 08, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 08, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€42,000
Duration
12 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€160,194
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
4,915 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of fuel chips for the needs of the Lejasciems boiler house

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be extracted from 'Nolikums', 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija', 'Līguma projekts']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Details to be extracted from 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be extracted from 'Nolikums']
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be extracted from 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be extracted from 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167634_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260308135419.pdf -- 96.2 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the supply of firewood for the Lejasciems boiler house, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Līguma projektsDOC
6_pielikums_Liguma_projekts.docx -- 38.8 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the supply of fuel chips for the Lejasciems boiler house, outlining the terms, obligations, and payment procedures for both the buyer and the supplier.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_GNP_2026_9.doc -- 184.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender concerning the supply of fuel wood chips for the Lejasciems boiler house, including general information, submission requirements, and bidder qualifications.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the supply of fuel wood for the Lejasciems boiler house, with a submission deadline of April 7, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for fuel wood supply is generally well-structured with clear basic information and attached documents. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the explicit specification of evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender's scope. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required fuel wood supply is clear. Key documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are provided, contributing to clarity. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria could lead to ambiguity for bidders.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Four relevant documents are attached. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate that details for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are to be extracted from specific documents, suggesting a potential for information to be fragmented or less accessible.

Details for key requirements are referenced in other documents rather than being explicitly stated in the main notice.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is noted. While the criteria for exclusion and eligibility are likely detailed in the referenced documents, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises a concern about full document accessibility for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. The contract duration and estimated value are specified. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential issue with the submission process, and financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission indicated
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Proper CPV code and NUTS code provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Use of e-procurement noted
Logical date sequencing

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential for fragmented information across multiple documents
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria within the main tender notice or ensure all referenced documents are fully accessible.
2. Provide explicit details on the e-submission process.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline