Leicestershire, Leicester and Rutland Adult Sexual Assault Referral Centre Services

This tender offers a clear description of services and a disclosed estimated value, but lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity of the service. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of the required service (integrated forensic medical examination and SARC) is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities reduces overall clarity.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and start date are present. However, the lack of detailed requirements and the fact that no document content is available significantly impacts completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the process is e-procurement. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation and the absence of detailed requirements could potentially lead to subjective assessments.

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a contract start date and duration. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating ambiguity. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.