Skip to main content
Tenders

Delivery of a master-class grand piano with accessories for the Karol Szymanowski State Music School of the 1st degree in Prudnik

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00162491/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Opolskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Opolskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€183,229
Avg. Bids
0.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
97%
2,351 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Delivery of a master-class grand piano with accessories for the Karol Szymanowski State Music School of the 1st degree in Prudnik

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Delivery of a master-class grand piano with accessories
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de85a8-7eea-d007-056e-e500011b847d.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for the delivery of a master-class piano and accessories to the Karol Szymanowski State Music School in Prudnik.

Formularz oferty z załącznikami -edytowalny.docxDOC
Formularz oferty z załącznikami -edytowalny.d...

This document contains a bid form and a declaration of no grounds for exclusion, required for submitting a tender for the delivery of a master-class piano and accessories.

Specyfikacja warunków zamówienia.pdfPDF
Specyfikacja warunków zamówienia.pdf

This document contains the terms of reference for a tender to supply a master-class grand piano and accessories to a state music school in Prudnik, Poland.

Wzór umowy.pdfPDF
Wzór umowy.pdf

This document contains a draft contract for the delivery of a master-class piano and accessories to a music school, outlining the terms, obligations, and payment conditions for both parties.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a master-class piano is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing and contract duration, impacting practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and a specified procedure type. However, the absence of revealed dates and potential for a short submission deadline (though not flagged as a rule violation here) could be a minor concern. The lack of disclosed evaluation criteria is a significant omission.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the required item (master-class grand piano with accessories) is clear. The attached documents, including the bid form, contract draft, and terms of reference, provide substantial detail for potential bidders.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and CPV code. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details such as contract duration and financing information are missing, which affects the overall completeness of the tender package.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with a clear CPV code and the use of e-procurement. Requirements are focused on the technical capability (delivery of a master-class piano), and there are no obvious signs of tailoring to specific companies. The value is not disclosed, which is a slight detractor from full transparency.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of explicit e-submission instructions (beyond the general 'e-procurement' characteristic), missing contract start date, and undisclosed contract duration limit the practicality for bidders needing to plan their resources effectively.

No e-submission (explicit instructions)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and CPV code are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender. The main inconsistency is the lack of disclosed value and duration.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. While the core requirement is a musical instrument, there's no indication of sustainability considerations in the procurement process.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Proper CPV code provided
E-procurement utilized
Comprehensive set of required documents (bid form, contract draft, ToR)

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of contract duration and start date
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Include details on contract duration and start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline