Skip to main content
Tenders

Biodiversity protection in the Brzesko Subregion - renovation of the historic park in Mąkoszyce

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00153199/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Opolskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
60 months
Location
Opolskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Biodiversity protection in the Brzesko Subregion - renovation of the historic park in Mąkoszyce

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Execution of site fencing: dismantling of existing remnants of the original fence and construction of a new fence with galvanized steel spans.
--Execution of a path: construction of a mineral surface walkway, 3.00m wide, finished with edging on both sides, total length of the path to be constructed is 155 m.
--Installation of lighting: installation of 3 park lamps.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de804a-62f3-7bf9-056e-e50001ac8109.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for construction works related to the biodiversity protection and renovation of a historic park in Mąkoszyce, Poland.

SWZ Specyfikacja Warunków Zamówienia 12.03.2026.docDOC
SWZ Specyfikacja Warunków Zamówienia 12.03.20...

This document contains the Specification of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the renovation of a historic park in Mąkoszyce, focusing on biodiversity protection in the Brzeski Subregion.

Załącznik Nr 1 do SWZ - Projekt umowy.docDOC
Załącznik Nr 1 do SWZ - Projekt umowy.doc

This document contains the draft contract for the public procurement of the renovation of a historic park in Mąkoszyce, focusing on biodiversity protection.

Załącznik-nr-3-do-SWZ_Wzor-formularza-ofertowego.docxDOC
Załącznik-nr-3-do-SWZ_Wzor-formularza-ofertow...

This document contains a template for the bid form, required for the tender concerning biodiversity protection and the renovation of a historic park in Mąkoszyce.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for historic park renovation in Mąkoszyce is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and available documentation. However, the estimated value is undisclosed, and evaluation criteria are missing, impacting transparency and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements with a clear CPV code and location. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. The absence of disclosed evaluation criteria is a concern for legal compliance regarding transparency.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Clarity80/100

The description of works is detailed and specific, including technical aspects of fencing, paths, lighting, and architectural elements. The AI-extracted requirements further clarify the scope. The main clarity issue is the lack of explicit evaluation criteria.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While many documents are attached, the absence of financial details impacts overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with technical requirements clearly outlined and a good range of supporting documents available. The use of e-procurement is positive. The lack of disclosed estimated value and evaluation criteria slightly reduces transparency, but there are no overt signs of company-specific tailoring.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a contract duration. However, the financing information is missing, and the contract start date is not specified. The deadline, while provided, might be considered short given the scope of work and documentation.

Financing information missing
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The consistency is high.

Sustainability50/100

The tender focuses on biodiversity protection and renovation of a historic park, which has inherent environmental benefits. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement criteria, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, limiting its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Detailed technical requirements
Comprehensive set of supporting documents
Clear CPV code and location
E-procurement utilized

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Missing financing information

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Provide information on contract financing.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline