Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Development of design and cost documentation for the task: "Expansion of District Road 2607S from km 5+230 to km 5+360, including viaducts No. 32 and 33 at km 5+257 and 5+297 in the town of Goleszów".

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00173112/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Śląskie, Poland
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Śląskie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€496,142
Avg. Bids
0.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
25,840 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of design and cost documentation for the task: "Expansion of District Road 2607S from km 5+230 to km 5+360, including viaducts No. 32 and 33 at km 5+257 and 5+297 in the town of Goleszów".

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires comprehensive design and cost documentation for a road and viaduct expansion. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating technical expertise, efficient project management, and a clear understanding of the permitting process, while leveraging the lack of specified evaluation criteria to emphasize core competencies.

Key Winning Messages

Proven expertise in delivering comprehensive road infrastructure design documentation, ensuring regulatory compliance and timely permit acquisition.

Commitment to quality, reliability, and adherence to all legal and technical standards throughout the project lifecycle.

Efficient project management and proactive engagement to facilitate the smooth realization of the investment.

Key Opportunities
The absence of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define value through a strong emphasis on technical competence and a clear understanding of the full scope of work, including permitting and author's supervision.
The requirement to obtain all necessary permits and decisions (e.g., ZRID/building permit) is a critical path item where a bidder's demonstrated success in similar processes can be a significant differentiator.
The need for author's supervision during implementation allows for showcasing a commitment to the project's success beyond just documentation delivery.
Key Challenges
The lack of specified evaluation criteria means bidders must infer the Contracting Authority's priorities and ensure their bid addresses all aspects comprehensively, without knowing specific weighting.

Focus on delivering a technically sound, complete, and well-presented proposal that clearly demonstrates capability across all stated requirements. Emphasize the completeness of the documentation and the bidder's ability to manage the entire process from design to permit acquisition and supervision.

The requirement for the bidder to bear all costs associated with obtaining permits and decisions can be a financial risk if not accurately estimated.

Conduct thorough due diligence on the likely costs and timelines for permit acquisition in the specified location (Goleszów, PL225 NUTS). Include a detailed breakdown of these anticipated costs in the financial proposal and contingency planning.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An engineering consultancy or design firm with proven experience in road infrastructure projects, including the development of detailed design documentation, cost estimations, and successful navigation of permitting and approval processes for public works in Poland. Experience with viaduct design and construction oversight is a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Development of complete design and cost documentation, including all agreements, opinions, and permits necessary for the implementation of the investment task.
Preparation of necessary geodetic documentation for project readiness (property divisions and acquisitions).
Obtaining the decision on road investment implementation (or building permit) on behalf of the Contracting Authority.
Provision of author's supervision during the actual implementation of the task.
Compliance with Polish legal regulations, standards, and guidelines for design documentation.
Delivery of documentation in both hard copy (bound, with table of contents) and electronic formats (DWG and PDF).
The design office must be equipped with appropriate hardware and licensed software.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated track record of successfully obtaining road construction permits (e.g., ZRID) in similar Polish administrative contexts.
A highly experienced and qualified project team with specific expertise in road and viaduct design, as well as permitting processes.
A proactive and transparent approach to project management, including clear communication protocols and risk management strategies.
A well-defined methodology for ensuring the quality and accuracy of design documentation and cost estimations.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is indicated, a proactive bidder could propose incorporating local employment opportunities for specific roles (e.g., junior engineers, administrative support) during the design and permitting phases, or supporting local educational initiatives related to engineering and construction.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (Implicit)

Provide detailed resumes of key personnel, highlight relevant past projects with similar scope (road expansion, viaducts), and present a clear, structured approach to developing the design and cost documentation, including quality assurance processes.

Permitting and Approvals Process Management (Implicit)

Detail the bidder's experience in navigating Polish administrative procedures for infrastructure projects, including specific examples of successful permit acquisitions. Outline a clear timeline and methodology for obtaining the required ZRID or building permit.

Completeness of Documentation (Implicit)

Ensure the proposal explicitly addresses every component of the required documentation (design, cost, permits, opinions, geodetic, author's supervision) and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the interdependencies between them.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Address All Documentation Requirements
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure the bid proposal meticulously covers all aspects of the 'complete design and cost documentation', including agreements, opinions, permits, geodetic documentation, and author's supervision, as detailed in section 3.1 of the SWZ.

Ensures compliance with the core objective of the tender and avoids disqualification.
Leverage Unspecified Evaluation Criteria
CriticalMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume the Contracting Authority will prioritize technical competence, completeness of the offer, and the ability to deliver the project end-to-end (design to permit). Structure the bid to highlight these strengths prominently.

Maximizes perceived value and strengthens the bid's overall appeal.
Showcase Permitting Expertise
HighMed effort

Emphasize the bidder's proven experience and successful track record in obtaining road construction permits (e.g., ZRID) and other necessary approvals in Poland. Detail the methodology and team responsible for this critical aspect.

Addresses a key risk and demonstrates a critical capability for project success.
Develop Detailed Project Execution Plan
HighMed effort

Provide a clear, phased project plan outlining the timeline for design, cost estimation, permit acquisition, and author's supervision. Include key milestones and risk mitigation strategies.

Demonstrates organizational capability and foresight.
Accurate Cost Estimation for Permitting
HighMed effort

Conduct a detailed analysis of potential costs and timelines associated with obtaining all required permits and decisions. Ensure these are accurately reflected in the financial proposal, including any necessary contingencies.

Prevents financial overruns and demonstrates fiscal responsibility.
Adhere to Documentation Formatting Standards
HighLow effort

Strictly follow the specified requirements for graphic presentation (clarity, compliance with norms, minimal sheets), binding (hard cover, table of contents), and electronic delivery (DWG and PDF formats) as per section 3.2.4 and 3.2.5 of the SWZ.

Ensures the bid meets formal submission requirements and is well-received.
Propose Local Employment/Support
LowLow effort

Despite 'Social Aspects: No', consider a brief mention of potential local employment opportunities during the design/permitting phase or support for local educational initiatives to subtly enhance the bid's appeal.

May offer a minor competitive edge if other bidders do not consider this.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and technically proficient partner capable of delivering a complete, compliant, and permit-ready design package, thereby minimizing risk for the Contracting Authority.
Highlight the bidder's understanding of the specific local context (Goleszów, PL225) and any relevant past experience in the region.
Emphasize the integrated approach, covering all stages from initial design to author's supervision, showcasing a commitment to the project's successful realization.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Development of complete design and cost documentation, including all agreements, opinions, and permits necessary for the implementation of the investment task: "Expansion of DP 2607S from km 5+230 to km 5+360 along with viaducts no. 32 and 33 at km 5+257 and 5+297 in the town of Goleszów".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b29-2e35-5053-5fad-950001e7112f.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the development of design and cost documentation for the expansion of road DP 2607S in Goleszów, Poland.

zalacznik_nr_1_oswiadczenie_o_wykluczeniu_oraz_spelnianiu_warunkow_udzialu.docxDOC
zalacznik_nr_1_oswiadczenie_o_wykluczeniu_ora...

This document is a bidder's declaration confirming they are not subject to exclusion and meet the participation conditions for the tender concerning the design and cost documentation for the expansion of DP 2607S in Goleszów.

zalacznik_nr_2_oswiadczenie_ podmiotu udostępniającego.docxDOC
zalacznik_nr_2_oswiadczenie_ podmiotu udostęp...

This document is a declaration by a resource provider stating they are not subject to exclusion and meet the participation requirements for the tender concerning the design and cost documentation for road and bridge expansion in Goleszów.

zalacznik_nr_3_zobowiazanie_ podmiotu udostępniającego.docxDOC
zalacznik_nr_3_zobowiazanie_ podmiotu udostęp...

This document is a commitment form from a third-party resource provider to make necessary resources available to the contractor for the project "Expansion of DP 2607S from km 5+230 to km 5+360 including viaducts no. 32 and 33".

zalacznik_nr_4_oswiadczenie_art.117_ust .4.docxDOC
zalacznik_nr_4_oswiadczenie_art.117_ust .4.do...

This document is a declaration for joint bidders, outlining the specific deliveries, services, or construction works each contractor will undertake for the project to develop design and cost documentation for road expansion in Goleszów.

zalacznik_nr_5_projekt_umowy.pdfPDF
zalacznik_nr_5_projekt_umowy.pdf

This document contains the draft contract for the development of design and cost documentation for the expansion of road DP 2607S in Goleszów.

zalacznik_nr_6_OPZ_Instrukcja_Ekspertyzy.7zZIP
zalacznik_nr_6_OPZ_Instrukcja_Ekspertyzy.7z

This document contains the description of the subject of the order for the development of design and cost documentation for the expansion of road DP 2607S and related viaducts, along with instructions for conducting expert assessments of bridge structures.

zalacznik_nr_7_Tabela_prac_projektowych.xlsxXLS
zalacznik_nr_7_Tabela_prac_projektowych.xlsx

This document contains a table detailing project works, including item numbers, descriptions, units, quantities, and net unit prices in PLN, for the design documentation of the road expansion in Goleszów.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for design documentation is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a good set of required forms. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear CPV code, a reference number, and a defined procedure type. The submission deadline, while potentially short, is present. There is no indication of disputes. The presence of required forms suggests a structured legal framework for participation.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required service is clear, detailing the specific road expansion project. The attached documents, including technical specifications and form templates, provide a good level of detail for bidders to understand the scope and requirements.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and a clear description of the task. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and financing information are missing, which affects the completeness of the tender package.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The requirements are generally objective, focusing on the development of documentation. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process. Full document access is implied by the listed attachments.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a contract start date and the lack of disclosed financing information reduce its practicality for bidders needing to plan resources and financial commitments effectively.

Missing contract start date
No financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The status 'active' is consistent with the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While not mandatory for all tenders, the absence of these elements limits its score in this category.

No green procurement mentioned
No social aspects mentioned

Strengths

Clear project description and scope
Comprehensive set of required documentation (forms, technical specs)
E-procurement platform utilized
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of contract start date and duration
No sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Include details on the contract start date and expected duration.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline