Skip to main content
Tenders

Repairs to Footbridge at Solitude Park, Banbridge

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
021705-2026
Value
£26,400
Location
Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Budget
£26,400
Duration
2 months
Location
Northern Ireland
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Council invites Tenders from suitably experienced and qualified service providers to carry out the required repairs to Solitude Park Footbridge in Banbridge. Further information available within Documents.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Tenders are invited.
--Further information available within Documents.
--Deadline: 2026-04-01T00:00:00
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be suitably experienced and qualified service providers.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Experience in joinery work (CPV: 45421000).
--Ability to carry out repairs to Solitude Park Footbridge in Banbridge.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements listed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for repairs to a footbridge is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a specified CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description is concise and clearly states the objective. Eligibility and technical requirements are generally outlined, referencing 'Documents' for further details. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria and the lack of accessible document content reduce overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the critical issue of missing document content prevents a full assessment of completeness, and specific financial requirements are not detailed.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is objective. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of accessible documents and evaluation criteria, which could hinder equal participation.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of e-submission functionality and the unavailability of document URLs or content significantly reduce practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document URL/content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logically ordered, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The data presented is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, which are common in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of emphasis on these important characteristics.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization, value)
Specified CPV code and NUTS code
Open competition procedure
Reasonable contract duration

Concerns

Missing document content and evaluation criteria
Potential short submission deadline
Lack of e-submission
No explicit sustainability or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Provide full access to tender documents and clearly state evaluation criteria.
2. Consider extending the submission deadline if feasible.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline