Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginUpgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login18 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.
LoginThis tender offers a moderately detailed opportunity for school cleaning services with a clear procedure and disclosed value. Key concerns include the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and the absence of sustainability considerations.
The tender adheres to the Procurement Act 2023 and outlines a competitive flexible procedure. The CPV code is correctly specified. While deadlines are present, the submission deadline's adequacy for a multi-stage process could be a minor concern. No disputes are noted. The procedure appears compliant with general procurement regulations.
The description of services is clear, and the initial scope of schools is well-defined. The potential for contract expansion is also communicated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria detract from overall completeness.
The procedure is described as transparent and non-discriminatory. The value is disclosed, and the process involves an initial selection stage followed by an invitation to tender, which is a standard fair practice. The use of an e-sourcing portal is positive. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.
The tender utilizes an e-sourcing portal for information and response, which is practical. The contract start date is specified. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the absence of document content accessible directly within the tender notice reduce practicality.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The contract duration and start date are logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The estimated value and the potential annual contract value are consistent.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the potential for sustainability integration.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required