Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Independent Advocacy and Children's Rights Services: Looked After, Child Protection Processes and Continuing Care

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
022840-2026
Value
£1,290,000
Location
Eastern Scotland, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Budget
£1,290,000
Duration
72 months
Location
Eastern Scotland
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Provision of an Independent Advocacy and Children’s Right Service for Children and Young People involved in child protection processes, looked after both away from home and at home, and those in continuing care.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a well-defined service with a clear scope and adequate financial disclosure, but lacks detailed requirement specifications and specific sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear procedure and appropriate CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though their adequacy is noted as a potential concern. No disputes are reported, and regulatory compliance is assumed given the structure.

Deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The core service description is clear, outlining the target beneficiaries and the nature of the advocacy and rights services. However, specific eligibility, technical, and submission requirements are not detailed within the provided text, leading to some ambiguity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Missing specific requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the absence of detailed requirement documents and specific exclusion/eligibility criteria reduces overall completeness.

No document content available
Missing detailed requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is open. Criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could impact perceived fairness if not addressed in the full documentation.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The use of e-procurement is positive. However, the absence of a specific document URL for full tender details and the lack of information regarding financing sources detract from practical ease of access and preparation for bidders.

No document URL specified
No financing info
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are consistently populated. No suspension or disputes are noted, and the timeline appears logically structured with a defined contract duration.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability into the procurement process.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description and scope
Open e-procurement procedure
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration
All basic tender information present

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria
No explicit sustainability or social considerations
Potential brevity of submission deadline
No document content/URL provided in the summary

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documentation with detailed requirements and evaluation criteria.
2. Incorporate explicit sustainability and social impact considerations in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline