Skip to main content
Tenders

LEGAL DOCUMENT TOOLKIT DEVELOPMENT

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
019769-2026
Value
£2,000,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£2,000,000
Duration
36 months
Location
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The National Archives has developed a variety of different tools for working with legal information through our work delivering the legislation.gov.uk, Lawmaker and Find Case Law services. The umbrella term for these tools is the 'Legal Document Toolkit'. There are specific tools which can securely receive, represent, store, transform, query, analyse, enrich, revise and publish legal documents of different types. The Toolkit has powerful drafting tools, both the new browser-based Lawmaker and an older but sophisticated Word-based template. The toolkit also has a variety of data transformation and enrichment tools. These enable us to take legal documents in hard to work with formats and convert them into machine friendly data formats - ideal for computational analysis using AI approaches. The toolkit has analysis tools, including a domain specific query language for legislation, the first (and we think only) one of its kind. An initial assessment of the Legal Document Toolkit has been carried out to identify potential tech transfer/exploitation opportunities, to test those opportunities against potential markets, consider their value and impact, and look at potential delivery models. The initial analysis revealed a list of ten potential opportunities and worked to validate and prioritise these based on how easy they would be to develop, the potential market value and impact, and how closely they might align with The National Archives wider strategies. The top-ranking ideas were then further developed to flesh out what might be required to produce something market ready. This initial work has identified a range of opportunities of varying type that could be taken forward however, it has also made clear that a considerable amount of work needs to be done to realise the benefits. Ideas need to be further developed, detailed market analysis and trials carried out, business models explored and identified, and investment options scoped and tested. Although the initial focus will be on the top-prioritised opportunities, we will want to test ones further down the list over time as well as any new ones that emerge either as a direct result of this work or by further innovation from within The National Archives. This process will take a number of years and will be sporadic, as funding for each separate opportunity will have to be secured based on the details of each instance. We hope to identify a consultancy partner that will be able to work alongside our in-house teams and provide expertise and guidance around exploitation opportunities in this sector. They will help develop propositions, test these within the appropriate markets, identify potential delivery partners and advise on appropriate business models. Expertise of building investable business propositions is essential, especially in the public sector. Knowledge and experience of the UK legal sector would also be highly desirable. We intend to award a contract for an initial period of 3 years, with two extension options of up to 12 months each. We anticipate that the maximum expenditure over the duration of the contract period (including any extension options) will be £2m including VAT (i.e. an average maximum expenditure of £400,000 per year).

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

20 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (8)
Technical (8)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated in the provided text. Bidders will likely need to detail their approach to the requirements listed above.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Must be able to work alongside in-house teams.
--Must provide expertise and guidance around exploitation opportunities in the legal tech sector.
--Must help develop propositions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Ability to develop propositions for legal document toolkit exploitation opportunities.
--Ability to test these propositions within relevant markets.
--Ability to identify potential delivery partners.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Maximum expenditure over the duration of the contract period (including any extension options) will be £2m including VAT.
--This equates to an average maximum expenditure of £400,000 per year.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Legal Document Toolkit Development is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a defined scope. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on the submission process, impacting overall transparency and accessibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance with a clear procedure type and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope, though the submission deadline could be tighter. No disputes are noted. The procedure is competitive.

Clarity80/100

The description of the 'Legal Document Toolkit' and the project's objectives is comprehensive and well-articulated. Requirements for the consultancy partner are clearly outlined, though specific evaluation criteria are missing.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. However, the absence of content for attached tender documents is a significant omission, hindering a full assessment.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses a competitive flexible procedure, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria for the consultancy partner are objective. The lack of explicit evaluation criteria and the absence of e-submission details slightly reduce fairness.

No e-submission
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration, along with financing information (estimated value). However, the lack of explicit e-submission details and the absence of document URLs reduce practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document URL
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, and the timeline appears consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as mandatory requirements. While the project's nature might indirectly touch upon innovation, it is not a stated focus.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives
Well-defined CPV code and NUTS code
Open and competitive procedure
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Lack of explicit e-submission process
Absence of sustainability and innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Provide clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Upload complete tender documents with accessible content.
3. Specify the e-submission process and provide necessary URLs.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline