Legal Compliance45/100
Significant legal compliance issues arise from the contradictory procedure types (Restricted/Competitive flexible vs. One-stage open) and the fundamentally incorrect CPV code (Lighting systems for Fire & Security). The absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds is also a concern.
•Incorrect CPV code (Lighting systems for Fire & Security)
•Contradictory procedure type (Restricted/Competitive flexible vs. One-stage open)
Clarity55/100
While the general description and AI-extracted requirements are clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged, significantly impacting clarity.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100
Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are mostly present. However, the tender lacks explicit evaluation criteria and detailed tender specifications beyond summaries. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Liable Person not specified
Fairness45/100
The lack of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity. Furthermore, the mandatory site survey/bidders conference, requiring DBS details and a Confidentiality Agreement by January 27th (from a January 21st analysis date), provides an extremely short timeframe, potentially disadvantaging many qualified bidders and limiting fair competition.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Extremely short notice for mandatory conference pre-requisites (DBS/CA)
Practicality65/100
The tender provides a portal for document access and implies electronic submission. However, the mandatory site survey/bidders conference with its very tight pre-requisite deadlines (DBS, CA by Jan 27th from Jan 21st) presents a significant practical barrier for potential bidders, making participation challenging for those not immediately prepared.
•Extremely short notice for mandatory conference pre-requisites (DBS/CA)
Data Consistency35/100
This tender suffers from multiple critical data inconsistencies. The procedure type is contradictory, the CPV code is fundamentally incorrect, and the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic contradicts the requirement for a 'single contractor'. These inconsistencies create confusion and undermine the reliability of the tender information.
•Contradictory procedure types (Restricted/Competitive flexible vs. One-stage open)
•Incorrect CPV code (Lighting systems for Fire & Security)
Sustainability25/100
The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.
•No sustainability criteria
•No social criteria