Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

RCC-1608 Rutland Residential Children's Home management and Service Delivery

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
019668-2026
Value
£8,400,000
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£8,400,000
Duration
60 months
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Management of a new RCC Children's Home, provision of services to children housed within it. Includes the lease from the property owned by RCC

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for residential children's home management is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detail on evaluation criteria and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure, which is standard. The CPV code is appropriate for the service. No disputes are reported. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight by some. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, outlining the management and provision of services for children in a new home, including property lease. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed as categories, implying they are documented, though the actual content is not accessible.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the lack of accessible tender document content prevents a full assessment of completeness regarding specific requirements and attached documents.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, suggesting broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. The main concern is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which could impact fairness if not clearly defined in the full documentation.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits the practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Well-defined service description
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Appropriate CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No accessible tender document content
Lack of e-submission details
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide clear evaluation criteria within the tender documents.
2. Ensure all tender documents are easily accessible, preferably via a direct URL or e-procurement portal.
3. Incorporate sustainability and social value considerations into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline