Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login23 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No processed documents available for this tender.
Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.
This tender for CDM Advisor services is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on the submission process, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.
The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance by specifying a CPV code and using a restricted procedure. The estimated value and duration are provided. The submission deadline, while not flagged as too short by the rules, is a point to consider in practice. No disputes are noted. The lack of explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds is a minor omission.
The description of services required is detailed, outlining the scope of work, types of projects, and experience needed. The eligibility and technical capability requirements are clearly listed. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.
Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and deadline. The duration of the framework agreement is specified. However, the lack of content for attached documents and the absence of specific submission requirements reduce its completeness.
The tender appears fair, with a disclosed estimated value and objective technical requirements. The inclusion of multiple subsidiary companies and external organizations as potential users of the framework suggests a broad reach. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. No specific company tailoring is evident.
The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The absence of a contract start date and the lack of specific financing information reduce practicality. The availability of document URLs is not confirmed.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical. The CPV code and NUTS code are present.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required