Skip to main content
Tenders

QRSV Blocks 5,6 & 7 Refurbishment

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
013903-2026
Value
£300,000
Location
Hampshire and Isle of Wight, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 28, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£300,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Hampshire and Isle of Wight
Type
Open Procedure
67
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The University of Winchester invites contractors to submit a tender response for works associated with redecoration and flooring works to three of our residential blocks within Queens Road Student Village.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit a tender response by the deadline of March 27, 2026, at 00:00:00.
--Submit the tender response via the University of Winchester's electronic tendering site.
--Adhere to the outlined login, registration, e-signature, and submission process for the electronic tendering site.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be a contractor capable of performing construction work, specifically redecoration and flooring works.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Must be capable of performing redecoration works in residential blocks.
--Must be capable of performing flooring works in residential blocks.
--Must be able to complete works across three residential blocks within Queens Road Student Village.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be able to undertake a contract with an estimated value of £300,000.
--The price of the proposed works will be evaluated, accounting for 70% of the overall tender score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Lot L-1HTM
L-1.html

This document outlines the login, registration, e-signature, and submission process for the University of Winchester's electronic tendering site.

OCDS RecordDOC
013903-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about the University of Winchester's tender for redecoration and flooring works at three student residential blocks, including buyer details and publication metadata.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
013903-2026_ocds_release.json

This document is an OCDS data package providing structured information about the University of Winchester's tender for redecoration and flooring works in three residential blocks.

Official PDF VersionPDF
013903-2026_official.pdf

The University of Winchester invites contractors to submit tenders by March 27, 2026, for redecoration and flooring works in three residential blocks, valued at £300,000, with evaluation based on 70% price and 30% quality.

Tender NoticeHTM
013903-2026.html

The University of Winchester invites contractors to submit tenders for redecoration and flooring works across three residential blocks at Queens Road Student Village, with submissions due by March 27, 2026, and evaluation based on price (70%) and quality (30%).

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

67
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides basic information for a refurbishment project but is significantly hampered by numerous data inconsistencies and contradictions across key fields. While the procedure type and core requirements are clear, these inconsistencies pose a risk to clarity, completeness, and data reliability for potential bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally complies with basic requirements for an open, below-threshold procedure. The CPV code is correct, and there are no disputes. However, the contradiction between "Value Classified: Yes" and the disclosed estimated value raises transparency concerns. The AI summary also lacks specific mandatory exclusion grounds.

Contradiction: 'Value Classified: Yes' vs disclosed estimated value
Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds in AI summary
Clarity80/100

The project description and core requirements are clear. However, a direct contradiction exists between the AI-extracted evaluation criteria (70% price, 30% quality) and the 'Issues' flag ('No evaluation criteria specified'). The mention of 'Divided into Parts' without further detail also adds ambiguity.

Contradiction regarding evaluation criteria (AI-extracted vs Issues flag)
Lack of detail on 'Divided into Parts'
Completeness70/100

Most essential information (title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, value, duration, CPV, NUTS) is present. Documents are listed. However, critical inconsistencies in financial value currency (EUR vs GBP) and submission deadline time, along with the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag, make the financial information incomplete or confusing. Details on 'parts' are also missing.

Currency discrepancy for estimated value (EUR vs GBP)
Submission deadline time discrepancy (12:00 vs 00:00)
Fairness85/100

The tender appears generally fair with an open procedure, a reasonable submission period, and objective evaluation criteria (70% price, 30% quality) as stated in the AI-extracted requirements. Electronic submission is supported, and requirements are generic. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag, despite the value being disclosed, creates a minor transparency concern.

Contradiction: 'Value Classified: Yes' vs disclosed value
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, no direct document URL is provided in the snippet, and detailed financing information beyond the estimated value is absent.

No direct document URL provided in the snippet
Limited detailed financing information
Data Consistency30/100

This category suffers significantly from multiple, high-impact contradictions. These include currency (EUR vs GBP) and classification of the estimated value, discrepancy in submission deadline time, conflicting statements on evaluation criteria, and conflicting statements on e-submission. These inconsistencies make the tender documentation unreliable.

Currency discrepancy for estimated value (EUR vs GBP)
Contradiction: 'Value Classified: Yes' vs disclosed value
Sustainability20/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided information. This indicates a complete lack of integration of sustainability principles.

No green procurement criteria
No social aspects mentioned

Strengths

Clear project description and scope
Open competition procedure
Electronic submission supported
Objective evaluation criteria (price/quality split) are stated in AI-extracted requirements
CPV code and NUTS code provided

Concerns

Multiple critical data inconsistencies (estimated value currency/classification, submission deadline time, evaluation criteria, e-submission)
Lack of detail on how the tender is 'Divided into Parts'
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the disclosed estimated value

Recommendations

1. Rectify all conflicting information, especially regarding the estimated value (currency and classification), submission deadline time, and evaluation criteria, to ensure a single, consistent source of truth.
2. Provide clear details on the scope and requirements for each 'part' if the tender is divided, to allow bidders to understand the full structure.
3. Consider incorporating green procurement, social clauses, or innovation requirements to align with modern public procurement best practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline