Skip to main content
Tenders

Network device type switch – 3 pcs., within the grant project no. FENX.06.01-IP.03-0001/23 titled "Support for Primary Health Care (POZ)" - based on Agreement no. 06OW/7424/I/2024

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00162481/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Małopolskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Małopolskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€662,690
Avg. Bids
0.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
4,174 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Network device type switch – 3 pcs., within the grant project no. FENX.06.01-IP.03-0001/23 titled "Support for Primary Health Care (POZ)" - based on Agreement no. 06OW/7424/I/2024

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de85a8-4f1f-e9c6-056e-e500011b8472.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for the supply of 3 network switch devices as part of a grant project supporting primary healthcare.

Zaê-1.docxDOC
Zaê-1.docx -- 62.3 KB

No content extracted

Zaê-2.docDOC
Zaê-2.doc -- 98.0 KB

No content extracted

Zaê-3a.docDOC
Zaê-3a.doc -- 79.0 KB

No content extracted

Zaê-3.docDOC
Zaê-3.doc -- 81.0 KB

No content extracted

Zaê-4 wzór umowy.docDOC
Zaê-4 wzór umowy.doc -- 165.0 KB

No content extracted

Zaê-5.docDOC
Zaê-5.doc -- 62.5 KB

No content extracted

Zaê-6.docxDOC
Zaê-6.docx -- 52.5 KB

No content extracted

Zaê-7.docxDOC
Zaê-7.docx -- 52.2 KB

No content extracted

SWZ 16_26.pdfPDF
SWZ 16_26.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Contract Conditions (SWZ) for the supply of three network switch devices by the Independent Public Healthcare Center in Brzesko, as part of a grant project.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for network switches is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and available documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement regulations with a clear CPV code and a specified procedure type. The deadline, while active, is relatively short given the submission date. No disputes or suspensions are noted. The primary concern is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is a significant legal requirement for transparency.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the required items (3 network switches) is clear. The tender notice and SWZ document provide a good foundation. However, the lack of explicit technical capability, eligibility, and submission requirements within the extracted AI information means clarity on these crucial aspects relies heavily on the full content of the attached documents, which were not fully summarized.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadline. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While documents are attached, the lack of extracted content for many of them hinders a full assessment of completeness regarding specific requirements. Contract duration is also not specified.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, promoting fairness. The value is not disclosed, which can be a concern for bidders. However, there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, and the criteria for selection are not yet specified, which is a significant drawback for fairness. Full document access is implied by the number of attached documents.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the financing information is not disclosed, and the contract start date is missing. The short submission deadline also impacts practicality. The lack of explicit technical and submission requirements in the AI extraction means bidders must thoroughly review all attached documents to understand practical submission steps.

Financing information not disclosed
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no noted disputes or suspensions. The dates are logical, with the submission deadline being in the future. The primary inconsistency is the lack of disclosed value and the absence of evaluation criteria, which are critical data points.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is EU funded, which implies adherence to certain EU standards, but specific sustainability criteria are not detailed.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization)
CPV code provided
Documents available for download
E-procurement utilized

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of specific technical/eligibility requirements in summary
Short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract to allow bidders to assess feasibility.
3. Provide more detailed summaries or extracted content for all attached documents to improve clarity and completeness.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline