Skip to main content
Tenders

Implementation of Hogweed Control Measures

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168550
Value
€14,756
Location
Latgale, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Detailed methodology for controlling the spread of Sosnowsky's hogweedTechnical
Experience in performing similar weed control servicesExperience
Financial proposalPrice
Appropriate equipment and personnel for the taskTechnical
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€14,756
Duration
Not specified
Location
Latgale
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€188,684
Avg. Bids
7.9
Competition
High
SME Winners
100%
7,851 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Implementation of hogweed control measures.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Proposals must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-02T10:00:00.
--Proposals must include both a technical and a financial submission.
--Bidders must adhere to the tender regulations and submission procedures outlined in the provided documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not be subject to any of the mandatory exclusion grounds as defined in the Public Procurement Law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered to perform the services.
--Bidders must have the necessary permits and licenses to carry out weed control activities.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must demonstrate experience in performing similar weed control services.
--Bidders must provide a detailed methodology for controlling the spread of Sosnowsky's hogweed.
--Bidders must propose appropriate equipment and personnel for the task.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a financial proposal outlining the costs associated with the services.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168550_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318111050.pdf -- 97.6 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning measures to control the spread of Sosnowsky's hogweed, including technical and financial proposal submissions.

Iepirkuma nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
Nolikums ar pielikumiem_latvāņu_ierobežošana.... -- 112.1 KB

This document contains the tender regulations for performing measures to limit the spread of hogweed, including general information, bidder requirements, and submission procedures.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a procurement tender concerning weed control services in the Preiļi municipality, with a deadline for proposal submission on April 2, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for hogweed control services in Preiļi municipality is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the absence of specified evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general public procurement laws, with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on available information.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. The attached documents are stated to contain detailed regulations and procedures.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration (implied by service type), and deadlines. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated, and the 'Issues' section flags restricted document access, potentially impacting completeness.

Missing explicit contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The value is disclosed, and criteria are generally objective. However, the 'Issues' section flags restricted document access, which could hinder full document access for some bidders.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'Procurement Characteristics' and may indicate a lack of clarity or a specific platform requirement. Financing information is not detailed, and contract duration is missing.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The tender is active with no reported suspension or disputes, and the dates are logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description and CPV code
Active e-procurement process
Reasonable submission deadline
Disclosure of estimated value

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Contradiction regarding e-submission
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Clarify document access procedures and ensure full availability.
2. Specify evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
3. Address the e-submission contradiction and provide clear instructions.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline