New construction of sports building for Olaine city stadium

This tender for the construction of a sports building in Olaine is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. The primary concern is the lack of explicit mention of dispute resolution mechanisms or a clear regulatory framework beyond general procurement rules.

The description of the works is clear, and the attached documents (Nolikums, technical specifications) are stated to contain detailed requirements. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria in the main notice reduces overall clarity for bidders.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, type of works, and duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for bidders assessing project feasibility.

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement, promoting fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag suggests that not all necessary information might be readily available to all potential bidders without further steps, potentially impacting fairness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential manual submission process or a lack of clarity on the e-submission platform, which could hinder practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes, and the timeline appears consistent. The tender status is active, aligning with the reveal and submission dates.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.