Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Framework Agreement for the Purchasing of Media 2026-2030

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
021674-2026
Value
£4,800,000
Location
Hampshire and Isle of Wight, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£4,800,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Hampshire and Isle of Wight
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The County Council wishes to establish a framework for the provision of media owner services. These services will include the supply of advertising space across a range of media formats, such as outdoor, digital, print and transport advertising. Media placements will be required to support a variety of campaigns across Hampshire.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--*
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--*
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Provision of media owner services including supply of advertising space across outdoor, digital, print, and transport advertising formats.
--Support for a variety of campaigns across Hampshire.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--*

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for media services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, includes a proper CPV code, and has no reported disputes. The submission deadline is within a reasonable timeframe for the estimated value and contract duration. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the structure.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, outlining the scope of media owner services and formats. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of detailed submission requirements and the absence of content in the tender documents reduce its completeness.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria, while not fully specified, are likely to be objective given the nature of media services. The lack of specific tailored requirements suggests good fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and financing details limits its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Well-defined CPV code and estimated value
Open procedure for broad participation
Logical timeline and contract duration

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of e-submission details
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to ensure clarity and fairness.
2. Upload full tender documents with content for better bidder understanding.
3. Clarify e-submission procedures and any financing information.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline