Construction works for the modernization of the SZOZ building in Zator

This tender for construction works related to the modernization of the SZOZ building in Zator is generally well-structured, with a clear description and a good set of available documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a CPV code and a clear procedure. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and potential issues with the submission deadline's reasonableness (given the lack of other timeline details) slightly detract from full compliance.

The title and description clearly state the nature of the works. The availability of various technical documents and forms enhances clarity for potential bidders. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical, and financial requirements leaves some ambiguity.

Most essential information like title, reference, organization, and deadline are present. A good number of documents are attached, including forms and technical specifications. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and specific evaluation criteria are missing.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The availability of all documents and the disclosure of the CPV code are positive. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified objective evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practical submission. However, the absence of information regarding the contract start date and financing details, along with the lack of explicit e-submission instructions (beyond the general 'E-Procurement' characteristic), limits its practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is provided, and the status is active. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documentation. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.