Skip to main content
Tenders

Development of construction design documentation and construction supervision for the construction of V55 road bicycle/pedestrian infrastructure, car parking lot, and new/reconstruction of Stacijas Street in Skulte Parish, Limbaži Municipality

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
167295
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 05, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
17 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of construction design documentation and construction supervision for the construction of V55 road bicycle/pedestrian infrastructure, car parking lot, and new/reconstruction of Stacijas Street in Skulte Parish, Limbaži Municipality
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must adhere to the regulations outlined in the 'Nolikums' document.
--Bidders must follow the requirements specified in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
--Bidders must submit their bids according to the procedures of an open tender.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be capable of developing construction design documentation.
--Bidders must be capable of providing author supervision for construction works.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Development of construction design documentation for cycling/pedestrian infrastructure.
--Development of construction design documentation for parking lot construction.
--Development of construction design documentation for street new build/reconstruction.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167295_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260305051027.pdf -- 96.2 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the development of construction design documentation and author supervision for the V55 cycle/pedestrian infrastructure, parking lot construction, and Station Street new build/reconstruction in Skulte parish, Limbaži municipality.

NolikumsDOC
nolikums42.docx -- 2.8 MB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender concerning the development of construction design documentation and construction supervision for road V55 bicycle/pedestrian infrastructure, parking lot construction, and Station Street new construction/reconstruction in Skulte parish, Limbaži municipality.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the main data for tender LNP 2026/42, which is an open competition for the development of documentation and author supervision for the construction of cycling/pedestrian infrastructure, parking lot, and street construction/reconstruction in Skulte parish, Limbaži municipality.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction design documentation and author supervision is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable. The main concern is the lack of explicitly detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, though this might be covered within the referenced documents. The presence of referenced documents ('Nolikums', 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības') suggests a structured legal framework.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, outlining the scope of work for infrastructure development and author supervision. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected from bidders. The referenced documents are clearly identified as containing specific requirements.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness. The contract duration and tender validity are specified.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The criteria are not explicitly detailed in the summary, which is a concern. However, there are no obvious signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies, and full document access is implied through the listed documents.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practicality. The contract duration is specified. However, the summary does not explicitly mention financing information or a clear contract start date, and the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks is contradictory to 'E-Procurement' characteristic, suggesting potential ambiguity in the submission process.

Ambiguity regarding e-submission process
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is flagged as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided summary, leading to a moderate score.

No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear project scope and technical requirements
Open competition procedure and e-procurement
Reasonable timeline and contract duration
Well-defined CPV code and NUTS code

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential ambiguity in e-submission process

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Clarify the e-submission process to avoid ambiguity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline