Legal Compliance65/100
The tender's 'planning' status mitigates some immediate legal concerns, but the absence of a defined procedure type ('None') and the classified estimated value are notable weaknesses. The missing 'reveal date' for a formal tender is also a concern for future compliance. CPV codes are correctly assigned, and no disputes are present.
•Missing formal procedure type
•Estimated value not disclosed (classified)
Clarity75/100
The description of the project, its objectives, and the AI-extracted eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are exceptionally clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly detracts from overall clarity for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the tender lacks a defined procedure type, the estimated value is undisclosed, and crucial evaluation criteria are missing, indicating significant gaps in completeness.
•Missing formal procedure type
•Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness55/100
The classified estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly hinder transparency and fairness, making it difficult for all potential bidders to assess the opportunity and prepare competitive proposals. The lack of e-submission also creates barriers to equal access.
•Estimated value not disclosed (classified)
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality50/100
The lack of electronic submission capabilities is a major practical drawback in modern procurement. While the contract start date and duration are clear, the absence of detailed financing information beyond PPA structures and the undisclosed value reduce practicality for bidders.
•No electronic submission supported
•Financing information (beyond PPA structure) is vague
Data Consistency70/100
Dates (submission deadline, contract duration, start date) are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, several key fields such as 'Type', 'Procedure', 'Liable Person', and 'Estimated Value' are unpopulated or undisclosed, impacting overall data consistency.
•Missing 'Type' and 'Procedure' definitions
•Missing 'Liable Person'
Sustainability85/100
This tender demonstrates a strong commitment to green procurement, explicitly focusing on renewable energy, carbon reduction, and achieving specific environmental targets by 2030. It also shows an openness to innovative solutions (DBFOM). However, it lacks explicit social criteria.
•No explicit social criteria mentioned