Skip to main content
Tenders

Grading services in Saulkrasti municipality in 2026

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168596
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Pieriga, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Pieriga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€82,313
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
4,915 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Grading services in Saulkrasti municipality in 2026

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit proposals according to the requirements in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
--Bidders must adhere to the submission procedures outlined in the "Nolikums" document.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-02T11:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned in the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be able to provide greiderēšanas (grading) services.
--Bidders must comply with the regulations outlined in the "Nolikums" document.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be able to perform grading services as described in the tender.
--Bidders must be able to utilize the roads and streets listed in the "Ceļu un ielu saraksts" document.
--Bidders must be able to use a work log similar to the "Darbu žurnāls Paraugs" sample.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are mentioned in the provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168596_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318161003.pdf -- 96.1 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning greiderēšanas (grading) services in Saulkrasti municipality for the year 2026, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and other necessary documents.

Darbu žurnāls ParaugsXLS
1. pielikums TS Darbu žurnāls_Paraugs.xlsx -- 10.1 KB

This document contains a sample work log for February 2026, detailing dates, street names, work titles, lengths, quantities, prices, and materials used.

Ceļu un ielu sarakstsXLS
Lēmuma pielik_LVC Saulkrastu_pagasta_celi (1)... -- 41.4 KB

This document contains a list of roads and streets belonging to the Saulkrasti municipality, detailing their characteristics, cadastral information, and maintenance classes.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums Greiderēšana 2026.docx -- 96.1 KB

This document contains the regulations for a tender process for gritting services in Saulkrasti municipality in 2026, outlining the subject of the procurement, the contracting authority, submission procedures, and evaluation criteria.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender for road grading services in Saulkrasti municipality in 2026, including procurement details, contracting authority information, and deadlines.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road grading services in Saulkrasti municipality is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, along with potential document access restrictions, slightly impacts its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable. The absence of disclosed disputes and the active status contribute positively. However, the lack of explicit mention of regulatory compliance beyond the 'Nolikums' document and the potential for restricted document access could be a minor concern.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, and the requirements are documented in attached files ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija', 'Nolikums', 'Darbu žurnāls Paraugs'). The list of roads is also provided. The main area for improvement is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which impacts the clarity of how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and type of service. Deadlines and the duration of the contract (implied by '2026 gadā') are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are outlined. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and there are concerns about restricted document access, which could hinder full document access for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a clear submission deadline. It is an e-procurement process. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the absence of a specified contract start date (beyond the year 2026) reduce its practicality.

No e-submission (implied by 'E-Procurement' characteristic but not explicitly stated as e-submission)
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The CPV code is provided. The consistency is high.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of services
Well-defined eligibility and technical requirements
Active e-procurement process
Reasonable submission deadline

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the contract.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline