Skip to main content
Tenders

Traffic safety improvement measures on the P5 Ulbroka–Ogre highway section 3.080–3.710 km (Ulbroka Secondary School) and renovation of state regional highway P5 Ulbroka–Ogre sections 1.970–3.300 km and 3.630–5.508 km

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
167195
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latvia
Published
March 08, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 08, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
5 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Traffic safety improvement measures on the P5 Ulbroka–Ogre highway section 3.080–3.710 km (Ulbroka Secondary School) and renovation of state regional highway P5 Ulbroka–Ogre sections 1.970–3.300 km and 3.630–5.508 km

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[Submission guidelines for various documents are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167195_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260308084456.pdf -- 100.7 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning traffic safety improvements and road restoration on specific sections of the P5 Ulbroka–Ogre highway, including submission guidelines for various documents.

Iepirkuma LVC 2026/25/AC nolikumsDOC
Iepirkuma_LVC_2026_25_AC_nolikums.docx -- 271.5 KB

This document contains the tender regulations for an open competition for road construction works to improve traffic safety on specific sections of the P5 Ulbroka – Ogre regional road.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender LVC 2026/25/AC, which is an open competition for road construction works to improve traffic safety on specific sections of the P5 Ulbroka–Ogre highway.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road works is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria impacts fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a clear CPV code. Deadlines are specified and appear reasonable. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the nature of the organization and procedure. No disputes are noted.

Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly outline the scope of works. Key documents like technical specifications and tender regulations are referenced, indicating documented requirements. However, specific evaluation criteria are not explicitly stated.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including organization, type of procedure, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. Key documents are attached.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition with WTO/GPA characteristics, suggesting a fair process. E-procurement is utilized. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and the 'Restricted document access' flag raise concerns about full transparency and equal access for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and provides document URLs. Contract duration is specified. However, financing information is not detailed, and the absence of explicit e-submission guidelines (beyond referencing a document) could be improved.

Financing information not detailed
No explicit e-submission guidelines
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender is active and valid for a reasonable period.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description of works
Open competition procedure
E-procurement utilized
Key documents provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline