Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Traffic safety improvement measures on the P5 Ulbroka–Ogre highway section 3.080–3.710 km (Ulbroka Secondary School) and renovation of state regional road P5 Ulbroka–Ogre sections 1.970–3.300 km and 3.630–5.508 km

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
167195
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latvia
Published
March 08, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 08, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
5 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Traffic safety improvement measures on the P5 Ulbroka–Ogre highway section 3.080–3.710 km (Ulbroka Secondary School) and renovation of state regional road P5 Ulbroka–Ogre sections 1.970–3.300 km and 3.630–5.508 km

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on essential road safety improvements and restoration on the P5 Ulbroka-Ogre highway. While specific evaluation criteria are not disclosed, a winning strategy will hinge on demonstrating technical excellence, cost-effectiveness, and a robust understanding of the project's safety objectives. Proactive engagement and meticulous attention to submission requirements are crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Delivering enhanced road safety and infrastructure reliability on the P5 Ulbroka-Ogre highway through expert execution and proven technical capabilities.

Commitment to timely and efficient project completion, minimizing disruption and maximizing public safety.

Key Opportunities
The specific focus on safety improvements around Ulbrokas vidusskola presents an opportunity to highlight specialized solutions for pedestrian and school zone safety.
The absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria suggests that a comprehensive and well-structured technical proposal, demonstrating a deep understanding of the project's scope and objectives, will be highly valued.
The relatively short 5-month duration requires a bidder to showcase robust project management and resource allocation capabilities.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to precisely tailor the bid to the contracting authority's priorities.

Develop a comprehensive bid that addresses all potential evaluation factors, including technical merit, cost-effectiveness, project management, and a clear understanding of safety objectives. Assume a balanced weighting across technical and price aspects, and prioritize clarity and completeness in all sections.

The absence of disclosed estimated value makes it challenging to benchmark pricing and assess the competitive landscape.

Conduct thorough market research to establish realistic cost estimates for similar road construction and safety improvement works. Focus on delivering value and demonstrating cost-efficiency through optimized methodologies and resource utilization.

The tender explicitly states 'GREEN PROCUREMENT: No' and 'SOCIAL ASPECTS: No', limiting opportunities for differentiation in these areas.

Focus differentiation on technical expertise, project execution efficiency, safety innovation (even if not explicitly requested), and a strong understanding of the specific road conditions and safety needs of the P5 highway.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced civil engineering and road construction company with a proven track record in highway maintenance, safety upgrades, and traffic management projects in Latvia. The ideal bidder will possess strong technical expertise, efficient project management capabilities, and a commitment to delivering high-quality, safe infrastructure within tight timelines.
Key Requirements
Compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds.
Demonstrated technical capability for road construction and safety improvements.
Adherence to submission guidelines outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.
Understanding and addressing the specific safety improvement needs at Ulbrokas vidusskola.
Efficient project execution within the 5-month duration.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated expertise in implementing traffic calming and safety measures in proximity to educational institutions.
A highly detailed and realistic project execution plan that clearly outlines how the 5-month duration will be met with minimal disruption.
Innovative (though not explicitly requested) approaches to safety enhancement that go beyond the basic requirements, demonstrating foresight and added value.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a formal requirement, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities during the project execution phase. This can be framed as a positive contribution to the community and a demonstration of responsible corporate citizenship, even if not directly evaluated.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Proposal (Assumed High Weight)

Provide a detailed, clear, and technically sound proposal that directly addresses the stated requirements for safety improvements and road restoration. Emphasize the experience and qualifications of the project team, proposed methodologies, and quality assurance processes. Specifically address the unique safety needs around Ulbrokas vidusskola.

Price (Assumed High Weight)

Develop a competitive and realistic pricing strategy. Ensure that the price reflects the scope of work, the required quality, and the project duration. Highlight cost-efficiency measures and value for money.

Project Management and Execution Plan (Assumed High Weight)

Present a robust and detailed project management plan that demonstrates the ability to complete the works within the 5-month timeframe. Include clear timelines, resource allocation, risk management strategies, and communication protocols.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Review 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'
CriticalHigh effort

Scrutinize 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for all submission guidelines, technical specifications, and any implicit requirements. Ensure every document is prepared according to these guidelines to avoid disqualification.

Avoids disqualification and ensures a compliant submission.
Develop a Comprehensive 'Assumed' Evaluation Framework
CriticalHigh effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, create a bid that excels in all likely areas: technical capability, project management, price, and understanding of safety objectives. Assume a balanced weighting and address each aspect thoroughly.

Maximizes scoring potential across all probable evaluation dimensions.
Highlight Expertise in School Zone Safety
HighMed effort

Emphasize specific experience and proposed solutions for enhancing safety around educational institutions, particularly for the Ulbrokas vidusskola section. This could include advanced signage, pedestrian crossings, or traffic calming measures.

Demonstrates specialized knowledge and tailored solutions, setting the bid apart.
Conduct Detailed Site Assessment and Risk Analysis
HighMed effort

Perform a thorough site visit to understand the existing road conditions, traffic patterns, and potential hazards. This will inform a more accurate and robust project plan and risk mitigation strategy.

Leads to a more realistic and defensible project plan, and identifies potential cost savings or efficiency gains.
Develop a Proactive Communication Plan
HighMed effort

Outline a clear communication strategy with the contracting authority, stakeholders (e.g., school administration), and the public regarding project timelines, potential disruptions, and safety measures.

Builds trust, manages expectations, and reduces potential conflicts or delays.
Propose Local Employment/Training Component
MediumLow effort

Even though not required, consider including a voluntary commitment to utilize local labor or provide training opportunities during the project. Frame this as a community benefit.

Enhances corporate social responsibility image and can be a subtle differentiator.
Focus on Value for Money
MediumMed effort

While price is important, emphasize the long-term value and reliability of the proposed solutions. Demonstrate how the chosen methods will provide durable and effective safety improvements, justifying the investment.

Appeals to the contracting authority's need for sustainable and effective infrastructure.
Competitive Positioning
Position the company as a reliable and expert partner for critical road safety infrastructure projects, emphasizing a proven ability to deliver high-quality results efficiently and safely, especially in sensitive areas like school zones. Highlight the company's understanding of Latvian road standards and conditions.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[Submission guidelines for various documents are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167195_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260308084456.pdf -- 100.7 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning traffic safety improvements and road restoration on specific sections of the P5 Ulbroka–Ogre highway, including submission guidelines for various documents.

Iepirkuma LVC 2026/25/AC nolikumsDOC
Iepirkuma_LVC_2026_25_AC_nolikums.docx -- 271.5 KB

This document contains the tender regulations for an open competition for road construction works to improve traffic safety on specific sections of the P5 Ulbroka – Ogre regional road.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender LVC 2026/25/AC, which is an open competition for road construction works to improve traffic safety on specific sections of the P5 Ulbroka–Ogre highway.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road works is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria impacts fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a clear CPV code. Deadlines are specified and appear reasonable. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the nature of the organization and procedure. No disputes are noted.

Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly outline the scope of works. Key documents like technical specifications and tender regulations are referenced, indicating documented requirements. However, specific evaluation criteria are not explicitly stated.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including organization, type of procedure, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. Key documents are attached.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition with WTO/GPA characteristics, suggesting a fair process. E-procurement is utilized. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and the 'Restricted document access' flag raise concerns about full transparency and equal access for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and provides document URLs. Contract duration is specified. However, financing information is not detailed, and the absence of explicit e-submission guidelines (beyond referencing a document) could be improved.

Financing information not detailed
No explicit e-submission guidelines
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender is active and valid for a reasonable period.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description of works
Open competition procedure
E-procurement utilized
Key documents provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline