Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

SADC: St Albans Museum & Gallery (SAMG) Roof Repair Works

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023836-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 01, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

St Albans City and District Council is looking to commission a suitably qualified and experienced contractor to undertake a range of roofing work at St Albans Museum & Gallery.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for roof repair works at St Albans Museum & Gallery is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and specified requirements. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and detailed evaluation criteria are notable drawbacks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements outline the necessary categories for submission. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria hinders a complete understanding of how submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a description. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is not available for review, impacting completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent. Access to full document content is not confirmed.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the unavailability of document content limit the practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, contributing to good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, which are increasingly important considerations in public tenders.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Specified CPV code
Open competition procedure
Basic description provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Potential short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Provide detailed evaluation criteria for submissions.
3. Ensure full content of tender documents is accessible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline