Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login11 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
3 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the requirements for bidders, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria for the renovation of apartments owned by the Riga City Municipality.
This document contains the regulations and appendices for an open tender process, including information on the tender subject, identification, contact persons, and procedures for obtaining documentation and asking questions.
This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the renovation of apartments owned by the Riga City Municipality (4th round), including identification numbers, deadlines, and contact information.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for apartment renovation by Riga City Municipality is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.
The tender adheres to general public procurement laws with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender's scope. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed value, which can impact transparency.
The description of the works is clear, and the attached documents outline mandatory requirements and procedures. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria in the provided information hinders a complete understanding of how bids will be assessed.
Most basic information is present, including deadlines, duration, and organizational details. The three attached documents cover the essential aspects of the tender. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value impacts the overall completeness of financial information.
The tender is an open procedure, and the use of e-procurement promotes accessibility. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag indicates a potential barrier for some bidders, which negatively impacts fairness. The lack of disclosed value also reduces transparency.
The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests that the submission process might not be fully electronic, which could reduce practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The tender status is active, indicating a consistent data flow.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of specific sustainability considerations within this procurement.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required