Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

AquaDjurs A/S – Fornæs Wastewater Treatment Plant – Expansion with aeration tanks – Mechanical and Electrical contract.

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
00163130-2026
Value
kr15,000,000
Location
Midtjylland, Denmark
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Budget
kr15,000,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Midtjylland
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

In the period 2026-2028, bottom aeration, mixing and sensor equipment for 2 new OCO pro-cess tanks with a volume of 8400 m3 and a depth of 7 meters will be established. Carbon dosing will be established for 2 old process lines and distribution structure FB405. The return sludge pumping station will be renovated with new electrical components and a new manifold for return sludge pumping. The task consists of a main contract for electrical and mechanical installations, expansion with LT03+LT04. With reference to the Utility Company Directorate

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids are not divided into sub-contracts as the contracting authority has assessed that the task is most appropriately handled by a single company.
--The tender is described in more detail in the tender material.
--No remuneration is given for submitting an application or offer.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information provided in the tender document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the tender document.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Installation of bottom aeration, mixing, and sensor equipment for 2 new OCO process tanks (8400 m3 volume, 7m depth).
--Installation of carbon dosing for 2 old process lines and distribution structure FB405.
--Renovation of return sludge pumping station with new electrical components and new manifold for return sludge pumping.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the tender document.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for wastewater treatment plant expansion is active and provides a clear description of the scope. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and information on submission requirements beyond the deadline.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline is relatively short. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is classified as 'competition' but lacks a specific code.

Submission deadline may be too short given the complexity of the project.
Clarity80/100

The description of the works, including the installation of aeration, mixing, sensor equipment, carbon dosing, and renovation of a pumping station, is reasonably clear. The technical requirements are outlined, and the CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline is present. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, crucial details like contract duration, financial requirements, and mandatory/eligibility requirements are missing from the provided text, necessitating a review of the attached tender documents.

Missing financial requirements.
Missing mandatory exclusion grounds.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the decision not to split the contract is justified based on the nature of the task. Access to tender documents is facilitated through an external link. No specific requirements appear tailored to a single company.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. A URL for external tender documents is provided. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The short submission deadline also impacts practicality.

Contract start date is not specified.
Financing information is not provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented, with the submission deadline falling after the notice publication date.

Sustainability50/100

The tender document does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated if the project is EU funded.

No mention of green procurement.
No mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear description of technical scope.
Open procedure for broad participation.
E-procurement utilized.
Estimated value and CPV code provided.

Concerns

Missing detailed evaluation criteria.
Lack of information on financial requirements, contract duration, and eligibility/exclusion grounds in the summary.
Short submission deadline.

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria within the tender documentation.
2. Ensure all essential information (financials, duration, eligibility) is readily accessible or clearly stated.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if the complexity warrants it.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline