Skip to main content
Tenders

UKP ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Open
Deadline
34 days left
May 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027591-2026
Value
£960,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 01, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£960,000
Duration
36 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The UK Portfolio is seeking a single supplier or a consortium of suppliers to: - support funded organisations to assess their organisation effectiveness - support funded organisations to identify development areas - provide training/support/advice to enable organisations to develop their effectiveness in the identified areas The UK Fund is a funding programme that covers two distinct thematic areas: - Connected Communities - Youth Voice The first awards were granted in February 2024, focusing on Connected Communities, and in 2025 the funding expanded to Youth Voice. The key themes that run across the different thematic areas are voice, relationship building, agency, community systems and lived experience. UK Fund has adopted a funding approach that spans across and between countries, rather than being geographically restricted, and focuses on supporting well-established programmes that demonstrate proven impact, enabling them to scale and expand further. The funding also prioritises equity - targeting only communities facing poverty, disadvantage, and discrimination. Another distinguishing factor about the UK Fund is its emphasis on long-term systems change, requiring projects to include a mix of service delivery and systemic transformation in their plans. The methodology and methods for all the work described above is to be suggested by the supplier. It is expected that this will incorporate co-learning and co-creation with grantholders.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (6)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Deadline: 2026-05-01T00:00:00
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Must be a single supplier or a consortium of suppliers.
--Must be able to support funded organisations to assess their organisation effectiveness.
--Must be able to support funded organisations to identify development areas.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Proven ability to support organisations in assessing their effectiveness.
--Proven ability to support organisations in identifying development areas.
--Proven ability to provide training, support, and advice for organisational development.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Value: 960000 EUR

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for organisational development services is generally well-structured, with a clear description of objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting its overall practicality and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the contract start date. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the required services is clear and detailed, outlining the scope of support for funded organisations. The eligibility and technical capability requirements are well-defined, although the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content limits the completeness of the information provided to potential bidders.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to any supplier or consortium, and the estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective. The lack of specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but the overall structure promotes fair competition.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of accessible tender documents with content reduce its practicality for bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, and the timeline is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of services and objectives
Appropriate CPV code
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Open procedure for broad participation

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of accessible tender document content
No explicit e-submission process mentioned
Limited focus on sustainability aspects

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Provide access to full tender documents with detailed content.
3. Clarify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline