Skip to main content
Tenders

Furniture delivery and installation at Lūzienieši Primary School

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
166322
Value
€27,000
Location
Latgale, Latvia
Published
March 25, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€27,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Latgale
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€31,439
Avg. Bids
2.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
4,396 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Furniture delivery and installation at Lūzienieši Primary School
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[General tender regulations are outlined in 'Nolikums']
--[Draft contract terms are provided in '7.pielikums_līguma projekts']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[Specific technical requirements for furniture supply and installation are detailed in '1.pielikums_tehniskā specifikācija']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166322_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260325211507.pdf -- 97.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the supply and installation of furniture for Lūznieki Primary School, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

1.pielikums_tehniskā specifikācijaXLS
1.pielikums_tehniska_specifikacija.xlsx -- 565.5 KB

This document contains the technical specification for the open tender "Furniture supply and installation at Lūzenieki Primary School".

7.pielikums_līguma projektsDOC
7_pielikums_liguma_projekts.docx -- 78.2 KB

This document contains the draft contract for the supply and installation of furniture for Lūzenieki Primary School, outlining the terms, conditions, payment, and warranty.

NolikumsDOC
LNP_2026_12_nolikums.doc -- 803.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the supply and installation of furniture at Lūzenieku primary school.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for the supply and installation of furniture at Lūzenieki primary school, with a deadline for submission of offers on April 13, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for furniture supply and installation is generally well-structured, with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the explicit specification of evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including the use of CPV codes and a clear open procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the requirements are documented across several attached files. The conditions for participation are outlined, though the evaluation criteria are not explicitly stated in the main notice.

Evaluation criteria not explicitly specified in the main notice.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications, regulations, and contract drafts are attached. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria impacts overall completeness.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to all bidders, and the estimated value is disclosed. Deadlines are reasonable. The use of e-procurement promotes fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag suggests potential limitations for some bidders.

Restricted document access.
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. A contract start date is implied by the duration and deadline. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The primary concern is the potential for restricted document access impacting practical submission.

Potential restricted document access.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no noted suspensions or disputes. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded and uses e-procurement, aligning with some modern procurement characteristics. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided details.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear financial information and estimated value.
Well-defined open procurement procedure.
Use of e-procurement.
Comprehensive set of attached documents (technical spec, contract draft, etc.).

Concerns

Restricted document access.
Lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria.
Absence of sustainability (green, social, innovation) considerations.

Recommendations

1. Clarify document access to ensure full transparency for all potential bidders.
2. Explicitly state evaluation criteria within the tender notice or accessible documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline