Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of natural gas

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
167331
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latgale, Latvia
Published
March 05, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Latgale
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€160,194
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
4,915 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of natural gas

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for natural gas procurement by Daugavpils Psychoneurological Hospital presents a moderate competition landscape. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating unwavering reliability, competitive pricing, and meticulous adherence to all technical and contractual specifications. Proactive engagement with the contracting authority and a clear articulation of supply chain robustness will be key differentiators.

Key Winning Messages

Uninterrupted and Reliable Gas Supply for Critical Healthcare Operations

Cost-Effective and Transparent Pricing Structure

Seamless Contractual Compliance and Operational Excellence

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to shape perception through a well-structured and comprehensive bid.
The absence of explicit 'Green Procurement' and 'Innovative Aspects' requirements simplifies the bid focus, allowing concentration on core supply and cost.
Potential for competitive pricing due to the absence of explicit sustainability mandates, allowing for a focus on pure cost-efficiency.
Key Challenges
The absence of disclosed estimated value makes precise pricing strategy difficult without market intelligence.

Conduct thorough market research on current and projected natural gas prices in Latvia, benchmark against similar public sector contracts, and develop a pricing model that offers competitive value while ensuring profitability.

The lack of specified evaluation criteria means bidders must infer the contracting authority's priorities and structure their bid accordingly.

Thoroughly analyze 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for any implicit weighting or emphasis. Prioritize clarity, completeness, and direct alignment with all stated requirements. Assume price and reliability will be paramount.

Potential for a highly competitive bid landscape given the essential nature of the commodity and the open tender format.

Focus on demonstrating superior reliability, robust supply chain management, and impeccable past performance. Highlight any unique logistical advantages or long-term supply stability.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established, financially stable natural gas supplier with a proven track record in public sector procurement in Latvia. The ideal bidder will possess robust logistical capabilities, a strong understanding of the Latvian energy market, and the capacity to offer flexible contract terms and competitive pricing. Experience in supplying to institutional clients, particularly healthcare facilities, would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Eligibility Requirements (Selection Criteria)
Technical Capability Requirements (Technical Specifications)
Financial Requirements (Financial Proposal)
Submission Requirements (Deadlines, Contact Info)
Contract Terms
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated long-term price stability and hedging strategies.
Exceptional customer service and dedicated account management for the hospital.
Proven ability to manage supply chain disruptions and ensure 24/7 availability.
Flexibility in contract terms to accommodate potential future needs of the hospital.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to local employment in the Daugavpils region for any operational or support roles related to the contract. This can be framed as a commitment to the local community served by the hospital.
Bid Focus Areas
Price

Develop a highly competitive and transparent pricing structure. Offer clear unit prices and any applicable surcharges or discounts. Ensure the pricing reflects current market conditions and offers value for money to the contracting authority.

Technical Capability

Provide detailed evidence of supply chain robustness, logistical capabilities, and adherence to all technical specifications outlined in 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem'. Emphasize reliability and continuity of supply.

Eligibility and Exclusion Grounds

Ensure absolute compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. Provide all necessary documentation and certifications proactively and without error.

Contractual Compliance

Demonstrate a thorough understanding of the contract terms outlined in 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem' and confirm the ability to meet all obligations. Highlight any experience with similar public sector contracts.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Analyze 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'
CriticalHigh effort

This document is central to understanding all mandatory requirements, exclusion grounds, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and crucially, the evaluation criteria. A deep dive is essential to tailor the bid effectively.

Ensures full compliance and maximizes the chances of passing initial screening and scoring well.
Infer and Prioritize Evaluation Criteria
CriticalMed effort

Given the lack of explicit weighting, infer the likely priorities of the contracting authority. For a public hospital procuring essential services like gas, price, reliability, and security of supply are almost certainly paramount. Structure the bid to strongly address these.

Aligns the bid with the perceived needs of the client, leading to a higher perceived value.
Emphasize Supply Chain Reliability and Contingency Planning
HighMed effort

Highlight robust logistical networks, multiple supply sources (if applicable), and detailed contingency plans for any potential disruptions (e.g., extreme weather, geopolitical events). This is crucial for a healthcare facility.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to provide uninterrupted service, a key concern for a hospital.
Conduct Comprehensive Market Pricing Analysis
HighHigh effort

Without an estimated value, benchmark current and projected natural gas prices in Latvia. Understand market trends and competitor pricing to formulate a competitive yet profitable bid. Consider offering price stability mechanisms if feasible.

Enables a competitive pricing strategy and avoids under/overbidding.
Strict Adherence to Submission Deadlines and Format
CriticalLow effort

Ensure all documents are submitted precisely as requested, in the correct format, and well before the deadline of 2026-04-08 10:00:00. Late or non-compliant submissions are grounds for immediate exclusion.

Prevents disqualification due to administrative errors.
Propose Local Employment Commitment
MediumLow effort

Even though social value is not explicitly required, a subtle commitment to local employment in the Daugavpils region for any support roles can be a positive, low-cost differentiator that aligns with community support.

Adds a positive, albeit minor, social dimension to the bid.
Clarify Ambiguities with the Contracting Authority
MediumLow effort

If any aspect of the tender documents remains unclear after thorough review, proactively seek clarification from Valsts sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību 'Daugavpils psihoneiroloģiskā slimnīca' via the designated channels. Document all communications.

Ensures accurate understanding of requirements and avoids potential misinterpretations.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and cost-effective solution for ensuring the uninterrupted operation of a critical healthcare facility. Emphasize a 'no-compromise' approach to supply security, backed by robust infrastructure and proven experience. Highlight transparent pricing and a commitment to long-term partnership.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--[Basic data for open tender, identification numbers, deadlines, and contact information in 'Main tender page']
--[Evaluation criteria outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[Contract terms outlined in 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Exclusion conditions outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Selection criteria outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--[Technical proposal requirements outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[Technical specifications outlined in 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Financial proposal requirements outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167331_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260305051440.pdf -- 96.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the purchase of natural gas by Daugavpils Psychoneurological Hospital, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
Dabasgazes_iegade_nolikums.docx -- 81.3 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the purchase of natural gas, including technical specifications and contract terms.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the purchase of natural gas, including identification numbers, deadlines, and contact information.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for natural gas procurement is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and potential restrictions on document access are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear open procedure and a proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and the tender is active with no reported disputes. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The core requirement (natural gas purchase) is clear. Key documents like technical specifications and contract terms are referenced, implying detailed requirements are available within them. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria in the main notice is a minor clarity issue.

Evaluation criteria not explicitly specified in the main tender notice.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. Key documents are attached or referenced.

Estimated value is not disclosed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about full document availability to all potential bidders. Objective criteria are implied to be in the referenced documents.

Restricted document access flagged.
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential manual or less streamlined submission process, impacting practicality. Financing information and contract start date are not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission indicated.
Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender is active with no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates are logically ordered. The contract duration is specified.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided information, indicating a lack of focus on these areas.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear open procedure and CPV code.
Well-defined technical and contract documents referenced.
Active status with no reported disputes.
E-procurement utilized.

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed.
Potential restricted document access.
No explicit mention of sustainability criteria.
No e-submission indicated.

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Incorporate and clearly state sustainability and innovation criteria if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline