Skip to main content
Tenders

Welding course - TIG method (Żagań county)

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00173380/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubuskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Lubuskie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,802
Avg. Bids
0.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
53%
6,312 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Welding course - TIG method (Żagań county)

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b30-9bee-911e-5fad-950001e71288.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for a TIG welding course in the Żagań district, co-financed by the European Social Fund.

zał. nr 1 do SWZ Formularz oferty.docxDOC
zał. nr 1 do SWZ Formularz oferty.docx -- 793.3 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 2 do SWZ - Opis przedmiotu zamówienia.docxDOC
Zał. nr 2 do SWZ - Opis przedmiotu zamówienia... -- 795.5 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a TIG welding course is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial aspects, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a CPV code and a clear procedure type. However, the absence of a 'reveal date' and specified evaluation criteria could pose minor legal ambiguities. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the purpose of the service is understandable. The availability of multiple documents, including a draft contract and application forms, contributes to clarity. However, the lack of explicit technical and financial requirements within the main notice reduces overall clarity.

Lack of explicit technical capability requirements
Lack of explicit financial requirements
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and deadline. The presence of 8 documents is a positive sign. However, crucial details such as the estimated value, contract duration, and specific eligibility/technical/financial requirements are missing, significantly impacting completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement and the disclosure of a draft contract. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern, but the absence of company-specific tailoring is positive. Full document access is implied by the number of attachments.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of information regarding contract start date, financing details (beyond EU co-financing mention), and contract duration limits its practicality for potential bidders. The submission deadline appears to be a standard e-submission.

No e-submission mentioned (though e-procurement is listed)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference number, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical, with the submission deadline well into the future. The CPV code is appropriate.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions co-financing by the European Social Fund, indicating a potential social aspect. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, innovation, or specific social criteria beyond the general ESF funding, limiting its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Clear title and description
Availability of multiple tender documents
Use of e-procurement
Appropriate CPV code provided
EU co-financing mentioned

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Missing contract duration and start date

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline