Skip to main content
Tenders

DLSITT1065 - Supply of a Canted 3-Pole Wiggler for Diamond-II

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023018-2026
Value
£240,000
Location
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 11, 2026

Budget
£240,000
Duration
15 months
Location
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Diamond Light Source (DLS) is upgrading to Diamond-II, a facility for atomic and molecular level research. The contract scope is to design, manufacture, test, and supply a canted three-pole wiggler (3PW) system as a complete unit for use in the Diamond-II storage ring. The supplier will need to verify and potentially modify an outline design provided by DLS to meet the performance specification.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (6)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-15T00:00:00.
--Further information can be found in the specification document.
--The contract duration is 15 months.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Suppliers must be capable of designing, manufacturing, testing, and supplying a canted three-pole wiggler (3PW) system.
--Suppliers must be able to meet the performance specification for the 3PW system.
--Suppliers must be able to verify and, if necessary, modify an outline design provided by DLS to meet the specification.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Design capability for a canted three-pole wiggler (3PW) system.
--Manufacturing capability for a canted three-pole wiggler (3PW) system.
--Testing capability for a canted three-pole wiggler (3PW) system.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated value of the contract is 240,000.0 EUR.
--No specific financial stability or turnover requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Canted 3-Pole Wiggler is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure, which is standard. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity of the required equipment. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required equipment and its purpose within the Diamond-II project is clear. The scope of work, including design, manufacture, testing, and supply, is well-defined. The AI-extracted requirements are also clearly articulated.

Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the absence of detailed tender documents with content and the lack of specified evaluation criteria detract from completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, allowing broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern for bidders. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair approach.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for accessing tender documents limits practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced. No suspensions or disputes are indicated.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common considerations in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical scope and description
Open procedure for broad participation
Disclosure of estimated value
Well-defined CPV code

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed tender documents
No explicit sustainability considerations
Potential for a tight submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Include specific sustainability objectives or requirements.
3. Ensure tender documents are readily accessible with clear links.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline