Skip to main content
Tenders

Development and supervision of the construction project "Development of a multimodal public transport network in Daugavpils city"

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
166757
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latgale, Latvia
Published
March 04, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
23 months
Location
Latgale
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development and supervision of the construction project "Development of a multimodal public transport network in Daugavpils city"
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submission of financial proposals.
--Open competition.
--Above the EU threshold.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements provided in the summary.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the summary.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Development and author supervision of a multimodal public transport network in Daugavpils.
--Submission of technical proposals.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the summary.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166757_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260304052411.pdf -- 98.2 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the development and author's supervision of a multimodal public transport network in Daugavpils, including technical and financial proposal submissions.

2.Pielikums_ Specifikacija_DVP 2026_41DOC
2.Pielikums_ Specifikacija_DVP 2026_41.edoc.b... -- 616.9 KB

This document contains the technical specification for the development and author supervision of a multimodal public transport network in Daugavpils, outlining project tasks, special conditions, and layout schemes.

NOLIKUMS DVP 2026_41DOC
NOLIKUMS DVP 2026_41.docx -- 152.9 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender above the EU threshold for the development and author's supervision of a multimodal public transport network in Daugavpils.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender DVP 2026/41, which is an open competition for the development and author supervision of a multimodal public transport network in Daugavpils, Latvia.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the development and author supervision of a multimodal public transport network in Daugavpils is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of proper CPV codes and an open procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and the process is defined. No disputes are indicated. The 'active' status suggests it is currently compliant.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the core requirements are outlined in the provided documents. The technical specification is available, contributing to clarity. However, specific eligibility and exclusion grounds are not detailed in the summary.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and contract duration. The estimated value is notably absent, which impacts completeness. Key documents like the technical specification and regulations are attached.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition and uses e-procurement, which promotes fairness. However, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria and potential restrictions on document access (as flagged in issues) could limit transparency and fairness for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. The contract duration is specified. However, the summary does not explicitly mention financing information or a clear contract start date, and the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks is a concern for practicality.

No e-submission (flagged in checks)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date) are logically ordered. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided summary, indicating a lack of specific sustainability focus.

Not green procurement (flagged in checks)
No social criteria (flagged in checks)

Strengths

Clear title and description
Open competition procedure
Use of e-procurement
Availability of key documents (technical specification, regulations)
Reasonable contract duration

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Potential restricted document access
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline