Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Facade washing

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168117
Value
€50,000
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Riga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€336,807
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
3,844 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Facade washing

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for facade washing services at a children's hospital presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, competitive pricing, and a clear understanding of the sensitive hospital environment, despite the absence of explicit social value or innovation requirements.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and High-Quality Facade Cleaning for a Sensitive Healthcare Environment

Cost-Effective and Efficient Service Delivery

Proven Expertise and Operational Excellence

Key Opportunities
Lack of explicit evaluation criteria allows for a strong emphasis on price and demonstrated technical capability.
The absence of green and social value requirements simplifies bid preparation, allowing focus on core service delivery and price.
Opportunity to differentiate through superior service quality and operational efficiency, even without explicit innovation requirements.
Key Challenges
The absence of specified evaluation criteria creates uncertainty regarding the weighting of different aspects of the bid.

Assume a balanced approach where technical capability and price are both significant. Thoroughly address all technical requirements and aim for a highly competitive price. Seek clarification from the contracting authority if possible.

Potential for a highly competitive market given the public sector nature of the client, even with a moderate estimated value.

Focus on demonstrating clear value for money and a superior understanding of the hospital's operational needs and sensitivities. Highlight past performance in similar environments.

Reliance on external documents ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Konkursa dokumentācija') for critical details requires meticulous review.

Dedicate significant time to thoroughly review and understand all requirements within these documents. Ensure all mandatory elements are addressed precisely.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established facade cleaning company with proven experience in public sector contracts, particularly healthcare or sensitive environments. They should possess a strong track record of delivering high-quality services, a skilled and trained workforce, and efficient operational processes. Financial stability and a competitive pricing model are also crucial.
Key Requirements
Compliance with Exclusion Conditions
Meeting Eligibility Requirements
Demonstrating Technical Capability
Adhering to Financial Proposal Requirements
Timely Submission of Application Forms
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience working within hospital environments, understanding of hygiene protocols and minimal disruption.
A highly detailed and professional operational plan that addresses potential challenges specific to a hospital facade.
A competitive pricing structure that clearly demonstrates value for money without compromising quality.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a statement on commitment to employing local workforce or providing training opportunities, framed as operational efficiency and community engagement.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Provide detailed evidence of experience, qualified personnel, appropriate equipment, and robust safety procedures. Tailor the technical proposal to the specific needs of a hospital environment.

Price

Develop a cost-effective pricing model that reflects efficient operations and competitive market rates. Ensure the price is sustainable for the 24-month duration.

Compliance

Meticulously address all mandatory exclusion and eligibility requirements. Ensure all application forms are completed accurately and submitted on time.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'
CriticalHigh effort

This document contains the core requirements, including exclusion conditions, eligibility, technical, and financial criteria. A deep understanding is paramount for bid success.

Ensures full compliance and avoids disqualification.
Prioritize Technical Excellence and Competitive Pricing
HighMed effort

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, assume both technical capability and price will be heavily weighted. Focus on demonstrating superior service delivery and a cost-effective solution.

Maximizes scoring potential across key bid components.
Highlight Experience in Sensitive Environments
HighMed effort

Emphasize any experience working in healthcare, educational, or other sensitive public sector facilities. This demonstrates an understanding of operational constraints and safety protocols.

Positions the bidder as a more suitable and lower-risk choice.
Ensure Timely and Accurate Submission
CriticalLow effort

Strictly adhere to the submission deadline and ensure all forms within 'Konkursa dokumentācija' are completed accurately and comprehensively.

Avoids automatic disqualification.
Proactively Address Potential Operational Disruptions
MediumMed effort

Outline a plan for minimizing disruption to hospital operations, including scheduling, noise control, and waste management, even if not explicitly requested.

Demonstrates foresight and consideration for the client's core function.
Consider Voluntary Social Value Commitments
LowLow effort

While not mandatory, a brief mention of local employment or sustainable practices can add a positive, albeit minor, impression.

Slightly enhances bid perception.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and cost-effective solution for a critical public service, emphasizing operational efficiency and a proven track record over novelty or extensive social value claims.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Application forms are provided in the "Konkursa dokumentācija" document.
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-08T10:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Eligibility requirements are outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Technical requirements are outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Financial proposal requirements are outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168117_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318163443.pdf -- 95.6 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the facade washing services for the Children's Clinical University Hospital, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Konkursa dokumentācijaZIP
Iepirkuma dokumentācija.zip -- 327.4 KB

This document contains the tender regulations and application forms for an open competition for facade cleaning services, identified as BKUS 2026/20.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open competition tender for facade washing services for "Bērnu klīniskā universitātes slimnīca" VSIA, with a deadline for submissions on April 8, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for facade washing services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is concise. Key requirements are referenced in attached documents, which is a standard practice. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the main notice reduces overall clarity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Three tender documents are provided, covering requirements and forms. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria in the main notice could be considered a completeness issue for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, and the value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is positive. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about full document accessibility for all potential bidders, potentially impacting fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is advertised as e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential issue with the submission process, which is a critical practical element. Financing information and contract start date are not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Reasonable timeline and contract duration
E-Procurement mentioned
CPV code provided

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential issues with e-submission process
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria within the main tender notice.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
3. Provide details on financing and contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline