Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Preparation of design documentation for planned investments.

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00174704/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Mazowiecki regionalny, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Mazowiecki regionalny
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€496,142
Avg. Bids
0.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
25,840 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Preparation of design documentation for planned investments.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8be5-2e08-ea1c-5fad-950001e71cb3.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice from the Poviat Road Administration in Pułtusk for the execution of design documentation for planned investments, requiring electronic submission of bids.

załącznik 2 Rozbudowa drogi powiatowej nr 3433W w m. Bartodzieje (ok. 2040m).pdfPDF
załącznik 2 Rozbudowa drogi powiatowej nr 343...

This document outlines the scope of work for the design documentation of the expansion of county road No. 3433W in Bartodzieje, including road surface, shoulders, intersection design, and site clearing.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for design documentation is generally well-structured with clear CPV codes and available documents. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and a clear procedure. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks. The deadline is noted as potentially short, but without further context on the complexity, it's difficult to definitively flag as non-compliant.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the CPV code is appropriate. The attached documents provide specific project details. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements leaves some ambiguity for potential bidders.

Mandatory exclusion grounds not specified
Eligibility requirements not specified
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the title, reference number, organization, and deadline are present. The CPV code and location are also provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and financing information are missing, reducing the overall completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The division into parts is also a positive aspect. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and unspecified evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, though no specific company tailoring is evident.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is indicated. However, the absence of a contract start date, financing information, and detailed submission requirements makes it less practical for bidders to fully prepare their proposals.

No e-submission (implied by 'E-Procurement' characteristic but not explicitly stated in requirements)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present and logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender notice or its associated documents. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and description
E-Procurement indicated
Documents are available and analyzed
Active status with a deadline

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
No sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects (green, social, innovation) if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline