Skip to main content
Tenders

Development of explanatory note and supply and installation of an electric elevator in Skrīveri, Piekrastes iela 7, Aizkraukle municipality

Open
Deadline
21 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168304
Value
€35,000
Location
Zemgale, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Tender Opening

April 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€35,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Zemgale
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of explanatory note and supply and installation of an electric elevator in Skrīveri, Piekrastes iela 7, Aizkraukle municipality
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted according to the regulations for an open tender procedure.
--Bids must adhere to the requirements outlined in the document "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
--Bids will be governed by the terms of the draft contract provided.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be able to develop an explanatory report.
--Bidders must be able to supply and install an electric lift.
--The procurement is funded by the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility, implying potential eligibility criteria related to this funding.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The ability to develop an explanatory report.
--The ability to supply an electric lift.
--The ability to install an electric lift.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168304_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318051107.pdf -- 100.2 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the development of a explanatory statement and the supply and installation of an electric lift in Skrīveri, Aizkraukles municipality.

Līguma projekts_DOC
Iepirkuma līgums pacēlājs.docx -- 57.9 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the development of a statement of explanation and the supply and installation of an electric lift in Skrīveri, Latvia.

Nolikums_DOC
Nolikums_ Pacēlējs_dzg.docx -- 146.7 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the development of a explanatory statement and the supply and installation of an electric lift in Skrīveri, Latvia, funded by the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open competition procurement for the development of an explanatory report and the supply and installation of an electric lift in Skrīveri, Aizkraukle municipality.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an explanatory report and electric lift installation is generally well-structured, with clear financial and timeline information. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could be a regulatory oversight. Document access restrictions also pose a potential compliance issue.

Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and key documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are provided. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. Essential documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are attached. However, the lack of detailed financial requirements and explicit exclusion grounds leaves some gaps.

No specific financial requirements detailed
No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with disclosed value and reasonable deadlines. However, restricted document access and the absence of specified evaluation criteria raise concerns about a fully transparent and fair competition. There are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is advertised as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential contradiction or a missing detail in the submission process. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is limited to 'EU Funded'.

No e-submission (flagged)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided details, limiting the sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear financial and timeline information
Open tender procedure
EU Funded status indicated
Essential documents provided (technical spec, contract draft)

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria to ensure transparency.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
3. Confirm and detail the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline