Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Supply of equipment for a gym

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168951
Value
€80,000
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€80,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€36,535
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
23,680 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of equipment for a gym
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for gymnasium equipment requires strict adherence to technical specifications and financial proposals. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating superior technical compliance, competitive pricing, and a robust understanding of the hospital's needs, despite the absence of explicit evaluation criteria. Proactive engagement and meticulous documentation are paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Quality and Technical Excellence: Delivering gymnasium equipment that precisely meets and exceeds the stringent technical specifications, ensuring durability and suitability for a hospital environment.

Value-Driven Procurement: Offering a highly competitive financial proposal that balances cost-effectiveness with the superior quality and reliability of our equipment.

Reliable Partnership for Health and Wellness: Demonstrating a deep understanding of the contracting authority's mission and providing a seamless, dependable supply chain for essential fitness infrastructure.

Key Opportunities
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define perceived value through strong technical compliance and competitive pricing.
The estimated value and duration suggest a need for a reliable, long-term supplier, allowing for a focus on partnership and after-sales support.
Detailed technical specifications in 'Nolikuma 2. pielikums' allow for precise product matching and differentiation.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to prioritize bid elements for maximum scoring.

Assume a balanced weighting between technical compliance and price. Focus on exceeding technical requirements and presenting a highly competitive financial offer. Document all aspects of the bid thoroughly to demonstrate value.

High volume of mandatory documents and forms ('Nolikuma 1. pielikums', 'Nolikuma 2. pielikums', 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības') increases the risk of administrative errors.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documents. Assign dedicated personnel to ensure accuracy and completeness in form completion and adherence to all submission guidelines.

Potential for high competition from established suppliers in the Latvian market.

Focus on clear differentiation through superior product quality, exceptional service, and a demonstrably competitive price. Highlight any unique selling propositions not easily replicated by competitors.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A supplier with a proven track record in providing high-quality gymnasium equipment, specifically to institutional clients like hospitals or public sector organizations. They should possess strong technical expertise to meet detailed specifications, efficient supply chain management, and a competitive pricing structure. Experience with public procurement processes in Latvia is a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Compliance with 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' (Exclusion Grounds and Technical/Financial Specifications)
Compliance with 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem' (Regulations and Submission Guidelines)
Completion and submission of 'Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Pieteikums' (Application Form)
Provision of Technical and Financial Offer as per 'Nolikuma 2. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija/ tehniskais - finanšu piedāvājums'
Meeting Technical Specifications in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Nolikuma 2. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija/ tehniskais - finanšu piedāvājums'
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience supplying to public sector or healthcare institutions.
Exceptional warranty and after-sales support packages.
Innovative product features that enhance usability or durability, even if not explicitly requested as 'innovative aspects'.
A clear, concise, and well-presented technical and financial proposal that exceeds basic requirements.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects' are marked as 'No', consider subtly highlighting any existing company policies that promote local employment, ethical sourcing, or community engagement, if applicable and verifiable. This can be a minor differentiator without adding explicit commitments.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Compliance

Meticulously review and cross-reference all technical specifications in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Nolikuma 2. pielikums'. Ensure every item offered precisely matches or exceeds the stated requirements. Provide detailed justifications and supporting documentation for each specification met. Highlight any areas where the offered equipment surpasses the minimum requirements.

Financial Offer

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy. Analyze the estimated value and competitor potential. Ensure the financial offer in 'Nolikuma 2. pielikums' is clear, itemized, and free of errors. Consider offering value-added services or bundled options that enhance overall value without significantly increasing cost.

Completeness and Accuracy of Submission

Treat all mandatory documents and forms as critical. Conduct multiple rounds of review for 'Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Pieteikums' and 'Nolikuma 2. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija/ tehniskais - finanšu piedāvājums'. Ensure all exclusion grounds in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' are addressed and confirmed. Adhere strictly to the submission deadline and format specified in 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem'.

Recommendations5
Exhaustive Technical Specification Matching
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly analyze 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Nolikuma 2. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija/ tehniskais - finanšu piedāvājums'. For each item, explicitly state how the proposed equipment meets or exceeds each technical requirement. Use clear language and provide manufacturer datasheets or certifications as evidence where appropriate.

Ensures compliance, avoids disqualification, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the client's needs.
Proactive Pricing Strategy Development
HighMed effort

Given the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, develop a pricing strategy that is demonstrably competitive while reflecting the quality and specifications offered. Benchmark against similar tenders and market rates. Ensure the financial offer is transparent and easy to understand.

Maximizes the perceived value of the bid and increases competitiveness.
Rigorous Document Review and Quality Assurance
CriticalHigh effort

Establish a multi-stage internal review process for all submitted documents, focusing on accuracy, completeness, and adherence to all instructions in 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem'. Pay special attention to 'Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Pieteikums' and 'Nolikuma 2. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija/ tehniskais - finanšu piedāvājums'.

Minimizes administrative errors and avoids disqualification due to non-compliance.
Highlighting Long-Term Value and Support
MediumMed effort

Emphasize the durability, warranty, and after-sales support of the proposed equipment. Given the 48-month duration, demonstrating a commitment to long-term partnership and minimal downtime for the hospital's gymnasium will be a strong selling point.

Positions the bidder as a reliable, long-term partner rather than just a supplier.
Clarification Questions on Ambiguities
HighLow effort

If any aspect of the tender documents ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības', 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem', or specifications) is unclear, proactively submit clarification questions to the contracting authority well before the deadline. This demonstrates diligence and ensures a compliant bid.

Reduces the risk of misinterpretation and ensures the bid accurately addresses the contracting authority's needs.
Competitive Positioning
Focus on demonstrating superior product quality and technical compliance that goes beyond the minimum requirements. This can be achieved by providing detailed specifications, certifications, and evidence of performance. Highlight any unique features or benefits of your equipment that directly address the needs of a hospital environment (e.g., ease of cleaning, durability, safety features).
Present a clear and compelling financial offer that highlights value for money. This doesn't necessarily mean being the cheapest, but rather demonstrating that the price is justified by the quality, longevity, and support provided. Consider offering bundled packages or optional add-ons that enhance the overall value proposition.
Emphasize reliability and a proven track record, especially if you have experience supplying to public sector organizations or healthcare facilities. Showcase your ability to manage the supply chain efficiently and deliver on time, which is crucial for a project of this duration.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted according to the guidelines in "Nolikums ar pielikumiem".
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-09T10:00:00.
--Bidders must complete and submit the application form "Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Pieteikums".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion conditions as outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must comply with the regulations and requirements specified in the "Nolikums ar pielikumiem" document.
--Bidders must confirm compliance with technical specifications and regulations via the application form "Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Pieteikums".
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must meet the technical specifications detailed in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" and "Nolikuma 2. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija/ tehniskais - finanšu piedāvājums".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Financial proposal specifications are detailed in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
--The financial offer form is included in "Nolikuma 2. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija/ tehniskais - finanšu piedāvājums".

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168951_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260324151238.pdf -- 113.5 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, and technical and financial proposal specifications for the supply of equipment for a physiotherapy room at Paula Stradins Clinical University Hospital.

Nolikuma 1. pielikums - PieteikumsDOC
Nolik_1_piel_Pieteikums_2026_30_AF_1.docx -- 21.2 KB

This document is an application form for participation in an open tender for the supply of equipment for a gymnastics hall, requiring bidders to confirm compliance with technical specifications and regulations.

Nolikuma 2. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija/ tehniskais - finanšu piedāvājumsXLS
Nolik_2_piel_TS_Apriikoj_pieg_vingros_zaalei_... -- 166.7 KB

This document contains the technical specification and financial offer form for the supply of gymnasium equipment, including a detailed list of items and general requirements for the bid.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
Nolikums_Aprikoj_pieg_vingros_zalei_2026_30_A... -- 111.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender for the supply of equipment for a gym, including general information, requirements for bidders and subcontractors, and submission guidelines.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender for the supply of equipment for a gymnasium, including identification numbers, deadlines, and contact information.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for gymnasium equipment is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has potential issues with document access, impacting overall fairness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, proper CPV code (though broad), and a reasonable submission deadline. The absence of reported disputes and the EU funding designation suggest regulatory adherence. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag raises a concern regarding full legal compliance if it hinders access to essential tender documents.

Restricted document access
Clarity80/100

The tender description is clear, and the requirements are documented across several attached forms and specifications. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are specified, although evaluation criteria are missing, which impacts overall clarity of the selection process.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. All essential documents (regulations, application form, technical/financial offer, requirements) are listed as required. However, the 'Restricted document access' issue suggests that not all necessary information might be fully accessible, impacting completeness.

Restricted document access
Fairness85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The deadlines appear reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the absence of specified evaluation criteria are significant concerns that could limit fair competition and transparency.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is designated as 'E-Procurement', suggesting e-submission is intended. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The 'Restricted document access' issue further reduces practicality by potentially complicating the bid preparation process.

Restricted document access
No explicit contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no specific mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided details, limiting the sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear documentation and required forms provided
E-Procurement and EU Funded designation
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value
Good data consistency and logical dates

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clarify document access policies and ensure all necessary documents are fully available to all potential bidders.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.
3. Incorporate specific sustainability or innovation requirements if applicable to align with modern procurement practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline