Skip to main content
Tenders

Children and Young People – Early Intervention and Prevention Service in Hertfordshire Hertfordshire

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
020633-2026
Value
£100,000
Location
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£100,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Type
Open Procedure
68
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

NHS Arden GEM CSU on behalf of NHS England (East of England) (the Contracting Authority) wish to commission services for Children and Young People (CYP) Behavioural Intervention Support Programme in Hertfordshire.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements detailed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be able to provide services in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be able to provide Children and Young People (CYP) Behavioural Intervention Support Programme services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements detailed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

68
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender offers a clear objective and basic financial information but lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting its overall quality and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness is debatable given the lack of detailed documentation. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity70/100

The description of the service is concise but lacks specific details on the expected outcomes or scope of the Behavioural Intervention Support Programme. Key requirements such as evaluation criteria are missing, making it difficult for bidders to fully understand expectations.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness65/100

While basic information like title, reference, organization, and estimated value are present, crucial details regarding specific exclusion grounds, detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing. The lack of content in the tender documents is a significant gap.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
No specific financial requirements detailed
Fairness70/100

The requirement for bidders to provide services in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian is highly unusual and appears to be tailored to specific companies or linguistic capabilities, significantly reducing fairness. The absence of specified evaluation criteria also hinders objective comparison.

Eligibility requirements tailored to specific languages (Estonian, Latvian, Polish, Lithuanian)
Practicality60/100

The tender mentions 'E-Procurement' but the 'Checks' section indicates 'No e-submission', creating a contradiction. The lack of detailed document content and specific submission requirements makes practical preparation challenging. Financing information is not detailed.

Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' check
No financing info detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender.

Sustainability30/100

The tender does not mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and basic description provided
Estimated value and CPV code specified
Active status and open procedure

Concerns

Highly specific and potentially unfair language requirements
Lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria
Missing content in tender documents
No sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clarify and detail all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and contain relevant content.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline