Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Provision of animal shelter services in Narva city 2026-2031

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Special
Reference
308326
Value
€124,419
Location
Estonia
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€124,419
Duration
60 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Special
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,359
Avg. Bids
3.5
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
97%
168 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of this procurement is the capture of stray dogs and cats within the administrative territory of the city of Narva, identification of owners, provision of shelter services at the shelter located at Kivilinna tn 30, Narva, and carrying out other animal-related activities in accordance with the HD and the Contract. The procedure is organized as a procedure aimed at concluding a concession agreement.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Narva animal shelter services is heavily weighted towards cost, making price the sole evaluation criterion. Winning requires a highly competitive price while demonstrating robust operational capability and adherence to all mandatory requirements. Focus on efficiency and a lean operational model to undercut competitors.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and efficient provider of comprehensive animal shelter services for Narva City.

A reliable partner committed to the welfare of stray animals in Narva, delivering services within budget.

Key Opportunities
Sole evaluation criterion is cost, allowing for a strong competitive advantage through aggressive pricing.
City-provided property and building reduce initial capital expenditure for the bidder.
Long-term contract (60 months) provides stability and potential for operational efficiencies over time.
Concession contract model may offer some flexibility in operational management, provided it aligns with the draft contract.
Key Challenges
Extremely low estimated value for a 60-month contract suggests intense price competition and potential for razor-thin margins.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all operational efficiencies. Explore economies of scale if the bidder operates in multiple locations. Consider a lean staffing model and optimized resource allocation.

Lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond cost means no points for quality, innovation, or social value, potentially limiting differentiation beyond price.

Ensure all mandatory and eligibility requirements are met flawlessly. While not scored, subtly highlight operational excellence and commitment to animal welfare in the narrative where possible, without adding cost.

Mandatory exclusion grounds and subcontractor checks require meticulous due diligence to avoid disqualification.

Proactively gather all necessary documentation for the bidder and any proposed subcontractors. Conduct internal checks for any potential issues well in advance of the submission deadline.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established animal welfare organization or a new entrant with a highly efficient operational model and strong financial backing, capable of delivering comprehensive animal shelter services at a significantly competitive price. Experience in managing municipal contracts and a deep understanding of animal welfare regulations are crucial. The bidder should be able to leverage existing infrastructure or a cost-effective setup for the provided facility.
Key Requirements
Lowest price as the sole evaluation criterion.
Responsibility for catching stray animals, their keeping, welfare, and disposal of carcasses.
Utilization of the property and building provided by the city.
Adherence to mandatory exclusion grounds and subcontractor checks.
Provision of a power of attorney for joint bidders (if applicable).
Indication of trade secrets.
Meeting equivalence requirements.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrably the lowest compliant price.
A highly efficient and streamlined operational plan that minimizes waste and maximizes resource utilization within the provided facility.
A clear and concise understanding of the scope of services, demonstrating an ability to deliver without unexpected cost overruns.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a scored criterion, consider a brief mention of community engagement, such as offering volunteer opportunities for local residents or educational outreach on responsible pet ownership, if it can be achieved at no additional cost or through existing partnerships.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost100%

Develop a detailed cost breakdown that is significantly lower than any anticipated competitor. This requires meticulous cost engineering, leveraging the city-provided facility, and optimizing operational processes for maximum efficiency. Ensure unit prices in the cost table are competitive yet sustainable.

Recommendations6
Aggressive Costing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a highly competitive pricing model by meticulously analyzing all operational costs, leveraging the city-provided facility, and identifying all possible efficiencies. Ensure the unit prices in the cost table are the lowest possible while remaining sustainable.

Directly impacts the sole evaluation criterion, maximizing the score.
Flawless Compliance with Mandatory Requirements
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure 100% adherence to all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and technical capability specifications. Any deviation will lead to disqualification.

Ensures the bid is considered.
Thorough Due Diligence on Subcontractors
CriticalMed effort

If subcontractors are to be used, conduct rigorous checks for criminal convictions, corruption, and other exclusion grounds as required by the tender. This is a mandatory check.

Prevents disqualification due to subcontractor issues.
Detailed Operational Plan for City-Provided Facility
HighMed effort

Outline a clear and efficient operational plan for managing the animal shelter using the provided property and building. Demonstrate how you will maximize the use of this resource to keep costs low.

Supports the cost-effectiveness claim and demonstrates capability.
Understand the 'Hankepass'
HighLow effort

Carefully review the 'Hankepass' and any accompanying explanations to understand the format of expected answers and the contracting authority's specific requirements for self-declaration, even though it's not a document to be filled out itself.

Ensures correct understanding of submission process and expectations.
Highlight Operational Efficiency
MediumLow effort

While quality isn't scored, subtly emphasize the efficiency of your proposed operations, demonstrating how your streamlined processes contribute to the lowest possible cost.

Reinforces the cost leadership message.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most economically advantageous offer, emphasizing a lean and efficient operational model that directly translates to savings for Narva City. Highlight the ability to deliver all required services at the lowest possible price point without compromising basic welfare standards.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (14)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS14
--The tender is for the entire service, not divisible into parts.
--The tender deadline is 2026-04-13 08:00:00.
--The tender value is 124419.0 EUR.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority requires checking conditions for subcontractors, including criminal convictions and corruption.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney for joint bidders.
--Bidders must indicate trade secrets.
--Bidders must adhere to submission conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The service provider must be responsible for catching stray animals, their keeping, welfare, and disposal of carcasses.
--The service provider will use the property and building provided by the city.
--The service provider must be able to provide the service for the period 2026-2031.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bidder must fill out the cost table for the provision of animal shelter services for the contract period 2026-2031, presenting unit prices for different services.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
308326_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 33.2 KB

The contracting authority requires conditions for checking subcontractors during contract execution, including questions regarding criminal convictions and corruption.

VastavustingimusedPDF
308326_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.9 KB

The tender document clarifies requirements for joint bidder authorization, business secret declaration, bid submission conditions, cost presentation, and equivalency for the animal shelter service tender.

Osa IV. Pakkumuse maksumustabelXLS
OSA IV 2026_Maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 12.3 KB

Bidders must complete the cost table for providing animal shelter services for the contract period 2026-2031, submitting unit prices for various services.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308326_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308326_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.7 KB

The procurement pass (Hankepass) is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion itself.

OSA II. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
OSA II 2026_ Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 35.2 KB

Narva city is seeking a provider for animal shelter services from 2026-2031, responsible for capturing, housing, welfare, and carcass disposal of stray animals, utilizing a city-provided property and building.

OSA III. Andmed teenuse osutamiseksDOC
OSA III 2026_ Andmed teenuse osutamiseks.docx -- 24.1 KB

This document details the property and service provision statistics for the animal shelter service in Narva for 2024-2025, which is necessary for preparing a bid.

OSA I. KontsessiooniteadeDOC
OSA I kontsessiooniteade.docx -- 29.6 KB

Narva city is seeking a provider for animal shelter services for the period 2026-2031, issuing a concession notice.

OSA V. Hankelepingu_projektDOC
OSA V 2026_Hankelepingu_projekt.doc -- 81.5 KB

The draft tender contract outlines the terms and legal framework for the provision of animal shelter services in Narva city for the years 2026-2031.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for animal shelter services in Narva is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of submission documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure is defined as a concession contract, which is a specific type of public contract. No disputes are noted. The duration and value are specified.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. The technical specifications and data for service provision are available. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as the lowest price.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. Key documents like technical specifications, draft contract, and cost table are available. However, the AI notes that the ESPD in XML format is not analyzed, which might be a point of incompleteness for some bidders.

Fairness85/100

The tender is open to all bidders, with objective criteria (lowest price) for evaluation. E-submission and e-procurement are mandated. The value is disclosed. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is required. The contract start date is implied by the duration and deadline. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The duration is clearly stated. The URL for documents is not directly provided in the extracted information, which could be a minor inconvenience.

URL for documents not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Strengths

Clear description of services and requirements.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-procurement and e-submission.
All basic information and key documents provided.

Concerns

Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Potential inconvenience due to missing direct URL for documents.
XML ESPD not analyzed by AI.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria to encourage greener and more socially responsible bids.
2. Ensure direct links to all tender documents are readily available for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline