Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of the heating system of the production building at Tuleviku 4, Kohtla-Järve city

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
308247
Value
€60,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 26, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid price excluding VAT100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€60,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The procurement aims to reconstruct the heating system of the building at Tuleviku 4, Kohtla-Järve city, along with associated general construction works.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Joint bids are permitted under specific conditions.
--Business secrets must be marked.
--Specific conditions for bid submission apply.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Absence of tax debts.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Average turnover in the last three years.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Compliance with the provided technical description and project.
--Adherence to the Construction Act.
--Completion of works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a bid as a cost breakdown, following the detailed cost breakdown provided in the base documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308247_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.6 KB

The tender document "Compliance Conditions" clarifies requirements for joint submissions, business secret marking, bid submission conditions, cost presentation, and confirmation of equivalence.

Pakkumus on esitatud ka kululoendina, vastavalt alusdokumentides toodud kululoen...XLS
Pakkumine kululoendina Tuleviku 4 küttesüstee... -- 15.2 KB

Bidders must submit their offer as a cost breakdown, adhering to the detailed cost list provided in the base documents.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308247_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
308247_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 9.9 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to comply with specific exclusion grounds and qualification criteria, including the absence of tax arrears and an average turnover for the last three years.

Lepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 37.6 KB

This draft contract outlines the terms and requirements for the reconstruction of a production building's heating system, which the contractor must adhere to.

Tehniline kirjeldus tingimustegaPDF
Tehniline kirjeldus eeltingimusega.pdf -- 148.1 KB

The contracting authority seeks a contractor to reconstruct the production building's heating system according to the provided technical description and project, requiring compliance with construction laws and completion of works.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for heating system reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable process, though it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope of work.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting' with cost being the primary factor, which is sufficiently specified.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, the tender does not explicitly state the provision of submission forms or templates, which might require bidders to create them from scratch.

Submission forms/templates not explicitly provided.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective (lowest price), and e-procurement is utilized. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are confirmed. Financing is linked to an attached contract project. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and the duration is relatively short.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear description of works and requirements.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criteria focused on cost.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.

Concerns

Lack of explicitly provided submission forms/templates.
Absence of explicit sustainability or innovation criteria.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Clarify if specific submission templates are available or if bidders should create their own.
2. Consider incorporating explicit sustainability or innovation criteria to align with modern procurement practices.
3. Specify the intended contract start date for better planning.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline