Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Organization of asbestos waste collection rounds in Lääne-Harju municipality in 2026

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
308186
Value
€12,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 26, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Asbestos waste treatment cost50%
Transport cost per collection round50%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€12,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€164,440
Avg. Bids
2.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
1,449 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the small tender is to find a cooperation partner whose task will be to collect asbestos waste generated in households of Lääne-Harju municipality residents, ensure its proper final disposal and transport, so that maximum environmental protection is ensured at optimal costs.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for asbestos waste collection in Lääne-Harju municipality prioritizes cost-effectiveness, with a 100% weighting on treatment and transport costs. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive, optimized pricing while demonstrating robust technical capability and strict adherence to environmental and safety regulations for hazardous waste. Leveraging existing infrastructure and efficient logistics will be crucial for competitive advantage.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective and Compliant Asbestos Waste Management for Lääne-Harju Municipality

Reliable and Environmentally Responsible Collection and Disposal of Household Asbestos Waste

Optimized Logistics for Efficient and Safe Asbestos Waste Rounds

Key Opportunities
Aggressive pricing due to the 100% cost-based evaluation.
Demonstrating efficiency in logistics to reduce transport costs.
Leveraging existing infrastructure and partnerships for cost savings in treatment.
Highlighting strong compliance and safety protocols to build trust.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the 100% cost-based evaluation.

Conduct a thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings. Optimize collection routes and treatment processes. Consider economies of scale if operating in adjacent areas. Explore partnerships with certified treatment facilities for better rates.

Ensuring strict adherence to all environmental and safety regulations for hazardous waste.

Develop a detailed operational plan that explicitly outlines compliance measures, training protocols for staff, and emergency procedures. Conduct internal audits to verify compliance before submission. Clearly articulate these measures in the bid response.

The estimated value of €12,000.0 suggests a small scale, potentially leading to higher per-unit costs for bidders.

Focus on efficient route planning and vehicle utilization to minimize per-round transport costs. If possible, bundle this service with other local contracts to achieve economies of scale.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced waste management company with a proven track record in handling hazardous materials, specifically asbestos. The ideal bidder possesses efficient collection logistics, established relationships with certified asbestos treatment facilities, and a strong understanding of Estonian environmental regulations. They should also have a lean operational model to offer highly competitive pricing.
Key Requirements
Ability to organize collection rounds for asbestos waste from households.
Capability to handle and transport asbestos waste.
Experience in waste management services, specifically hazardous waste.
Compliance with all relevant environmental and safety regulations for asbestos.
Submission of pricing for handling and transport of asbestos waste.
Adherence to the draft contract ('Hankelepingu projekt.docx').
Alignment with technical specifications ('Tehniline kirjeldus.docx').
Provision of a confirmation statement (Hankepass).
Key Discriminators
Demonstrably optimized logistics and route planning that leads to the lowest transport cost per round.
A highly competitive treatment cost achieved through established, efficient partnerships with certified disposal facilities.
A clear and concise operational plan that highlights robust safety and environmental compliance, exceeding minimum requirements.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, a bidder could propose local employment opportunities for collection staff or offer educational materials to residents on safe asbestos handling during collection, framing it as an added value to the community.
Bid Focus Areas
Asbestos waste treatment cost50.0%

Achieve the lowest possible treatment cost by securing favorable rates from certified disposal facilities. Clearly outline the chosen facility and its certifications. If possible, demonstrate economies of scale or efficient pre-treatment processes that reduce final disposal costs.

Transport cost per collection round50.0%

Develop a highly efficient collection route plan for the specified four locations and two rounds. Optimize vehicle capacity and minimize travel time. Present a clear, logical route plan and justify the cost based on realistic operational parameters. Consider vehicle type and fuel efficiency.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price for Lowest Cost
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% cost-based evaluation, the primary focus must be on submitting the absolute lowest possible price for both treatment and transport. Conduct a granular cost breakdown to identify all areas for optimization.

Directly maximizes score in both evaluation criteria, significantly increasing win probability.
Detail Asbestos Handling and Safety Protocols
CriticalMed effort

Explicitly detail the procedures for collecting, handling, transporting, and disposing of asbestos waste, emphasizing compliance with all relevant Estonian environmental and safety regulations. Include staff training, personal protective equipment (PPE), and emergency response plans.

Meets a critical technical capability requirement and builds confidence in the bidder's ability to execute the contract safely and legally.
Optimize Collection Route and Logistics
HighMed effort

Develop a detailed and efficient collection route plan for the four specified locations and two collection rounds. Demonstrate how this plan minimizes travel time, fuel consumption, and vehicle wear, directly impacting the transport cost per round.

Reduces transport costs, a key evaluation criterion, and demonstrates operational efficiency.
Secure Competitive Treatment Facility Rates
HighMed effort

Establish strong relationships with certified asbestos treatment facilities to secure the most competitive disposal rates. Clearly state the chosen facility and its compliance credentials in the bid.

Directly impacts the asbestos waste treatment cost, a key evaluation criterion, and ensures regulatory compliance.
Proactive Communication and Clarity in Hankepass
MediumLow effort

Ensure the Hankepass (ESPD) is completed accurately and comprehensively. If any clarifications are needed regarding the requirements or the Hankepass itself, proactively seek them from the contracting authority.

Avoids potential disqualification due to administrative errors and demonstrates diligence.
Thorough Review of Draft Contract and Technical Specifications
MediumMed effort

Scrutinize 'Hankelepingu projekt.docx' and 'Tehniline kirjeldus.docx' to ensure full alignment. Identify any potential ambiguities or onerous clauses and address them in the bid or through clarification requests.

Prevents future contractual disputes and ensures the bid accurately reflects the bidder's capabilities and proposed service.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on safety and environmental compliance. Emphasize operational efficiency and established partnerships that enable lower costs. Highlight a deep understanding of local regulations and a commitment to serving the Lääne-Harju community effectively.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-06 08:00:00.
--The bid must include pricing for handling and transport of asbestos waste.
--The bid will be evaluated based on the lowest price.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but implied by general procurement law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be a legal entity capable of providing the services.
--Must not be in a state of bankruptcy, liquidation, or cessation of business.
--Must not have outstanding tax liabilities.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Ability to organize collection rounds for asbestos waste from households.
--Capability to handle and transport asbestos waste.
--Experience in waste management services, specifically hazardous waste.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated, but bidders are expected to be financially stable to perform the contract.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308186_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 5.5 KB

This document clarifies conditions for joint offers, trade secrets, subcontractor engagement, and bid submission, which are necessary for participation in the Lääne-Harju municipality's asbestos waste collection tender.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308186_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

The tender evaluation criteria focus on the cost of asbestos waste treatment and transportation, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308186_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 36.3 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 30.4 KB

The draft contract outlines the terms for organizing asbestos waste collection rounds, the Contractor's obligations, and the object of the contract.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 20.9 KB

Lääne-Harju Municipality is seeking a partner to collect, process, and transport asbestos waste from households in 2026 through two collection rounds at four locations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for asbestos waste collection in Lääne-Harju municipality is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a focus on electronic submission. However, it lacks explicit details on contract duration and social/innovative aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable for a small tender. No disputes are noted. The financing condition is clearly stated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. Key documents like 'Vastavustingimused' and 'Hankelepingu projekt' are specified.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value and deadlines. However, the contract duration is missing, which is a significant omission. The number of attached documents is adequate.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation is based on relative weighting, with a clear emphasis on the lowest price, which is objective. Full document access is implied.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, which is practical. However, the contract start date is not specified, and the financing condition, while present, could be more detailed regarding the specific contributions.

Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated correctly. The dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

The tender includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, aligning with sustainability goals. However, there are no specific social criteria or innovation focuses mentioned, and it is not indicated as EU funded.

No explicit social criteria
No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Clear description of service and objectives
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price)
Reasonable deadlines for a small tender

Concerns

Missing contract duration
Missing contract start date
Limited sustainability aspects beyond 'Green Procurement'

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract duration clearly.
2. Include the contract start date.
3. Elaborate on specific social or innovation requirements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline