Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login13 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
6 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines compliance conditions regarding joint bids, bid submission, cost presentation, and equivalency, and is necessary for bid submission.
The bid cost table is a required form to enter the cost of drainage ditch maintenance works, including all costs and risks.
In the tender "Drainage ditch maintenance works 2026", bids are evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
The procurement passport (Hankepass) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
The contracting authority seeks a contractor for drainage ditch maintenance in Narva, involving deepening and cleaning ditches, requiring appropriate equipment and landowner notification.
The draft contract outlines the terms and legal framework for the execution of drainage ditch maintenance works for the city of Narva in 2026.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for drainage ditch maintenance in Narva is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies on a reverse procedure for qualification checks.
The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear timeline. The use of a reverse procedure for qualification checks is a common practice but can add complexity. No disputes are noted. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender value.
The description of works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview. The mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements are explicitly stated. The evaluation criteria are also clearly defined as cost-based.
Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the 'Tender Valid' duration is specified in months, which is less precise than days. While several documents are attached, some are in formats not directly analyzable by AI (JPG, XML), potentially hindering a full automated review.
The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation is solely based on cost, which is objective. The use of a 'Hankepass' (tender pass) as a self-declaration is a common and fair approach. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.
E-submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, only the duration. Financing information is not detailed. The duration type is specified as 'DAYS', but the 'Tender Valid' is in months.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The tender validity period is stated as '4 months', which is consistent with the duration type 'DAYS' if interpreted as a specific number of days.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required