Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Provision of children's train attraction service at Tallinn Zoo 2026-2029

Open
Deadline
26 days left
April 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
308144
Value
€10,500
Location
Estonia
Published
March 30, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid evaluation Cost - highest is best100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 30, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 30, 2026

Tender Opening

April 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€10,500
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€472,450
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
317 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the contract is the provision of an electrically powered children's train attraction service at Tallinn Zoo in the years 2026-2029. The Children's Railway – an oval-shaped track approximately 175 m long (track gauge 890 mm) located on an area of approximately 1700 m2 within the zoo's enclosed territory – will be made available for use.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the Tallinn Zoo children's train attraction presents a unique opportunity focused on operational excellence and cost-effectiveness. The key to winning lies in demonstrating a robust operational plan for the specified track and equipment, coupled with a highly competitive financial offer, as price is the sole evaluation criterion. Proactive engagement with the Hankepass and clear confirmation of non-affiliation with Russian entities are critical for eligibility.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Safe Operation of the Children's Train Attraction

Maximizing Value for Tallinn Zoo through a Competitive Financial Offer

Key Opportunities
The tender is based on a concession agreement, which may offer some flexibility in operational details beyond the core requirements.
The estimated value is relatively low, suggesting a potentially less competitive field, especially if bidders focus solely on the financial aspect.
The specific track dimensions (175m, 890mm gauge) and area (1700m2) are clearly defined, allowing for precise operational planning and cost estimation.
Key Challenges
The sole evaluation criterion being the highest price means intense price competition, potentially squeezing margins.

Develop a highly efficient operational model and secure cost-effective sourcing for train equipment if not already owned. Explore economies of scale if the bidder operates multiple similar attractions.

The Hankepass (ESPD) is an electronic self-declaration, requiring meticulous completion to avoid exclusion. The AI analysis of the ESPD document was not supported, highlighting the need for manual, careful review.

Dedicate sufficient time and resources to accurately complete the Hankepass. Have a senior team member or legal counsel review it before submission. Understand the specific requirements of the 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' document.

Lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond price means bidders must infer the importance of other aspects like technical capability and operational plan, even if not directly scored.

While price is paramount, a technically sound and operationally robust proposal will instill confidence in the contracting authority, potentially influencing their perception if any qualitative aspects are implicitly considered or if there are tie-breaking scenarios.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced operator of small-scale amusement or transport attractions, with a proven track record of safe and reliable service delivery. The ideal bidder will possess the necessary train equipment or have a clear, cost-effective plan for its acquisition/rental, and a strong understanding of operating within a public, family-oriented environment. They must also be adept at completing complex electronic procurement documentation like the Hankepass.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation
Completion of Hankepass (ESPD) electronically
Demonstrated technical capability to operate a children's train attraction on the provided track
Highest price (financial offer) as the sole evaluation criterion
Compliance with the Public Procurement Act
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably superior safety record for operating children's attractions.
A highly detailed and realistic operational plan that addresses the specific constraints of the Tallinn Zoo environment.
A proactive and responsive approach to communication with the contracting authority during the tender process.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to employing local staff for operational roles, contributing to local employment opportunities.
Bid Focus Areas
Financial Offer (Price)100%

Submit the most aggressive price possible while ensuring profitability. Conduct thorough cost analysis, including operational, maintenance, and potential contingency costs. Benchmark against similar services if possible.

Recommendations6
Meticulously Complete Hankepass (ESPD)
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure all sections of the Hankepass are accurately and completely filled out electronically. Pay close attention to the confirmation of no Russian Federation connections. This is the primary gatekeeper for eligibility.

Ensures eligibility to bid.
Aggressively Price the Bid
CriticalHigh effort

As price is the sole evaluation criterion, the winning bid will be the highest price. Develop a lean operational cost model and submit a highly competitive offer that maximizes the chances of winning while remaining profitable.

Directly determines the winning bid.
Demonstrate Operational Readiness and Expertise
HighMed effort

While not explicitly scored, a clear and detailed operational plan for the children's train, including maintenance, safety protocols, and staffing, will build confidence. Reference experience with similar attractions.

Increases confidence in bidder's ability to deliver the service.
Verify All Subcontractor/Supplier Affiliations
HighMed effort

Thoroughly vet all potential subcontractors and suppliers to ensure no direct or indirect connections to the Russian Federation, as per the mandatory exclusion grounds.

Prevents disqualification.
Understand Concession Agreement Implications
MediumLow effort

Review the tender documents carefully to understand the specifics of the concession agreement. Identify any areas where flexibility might exist or where specific responsibilities are allocated to the concessionaire.

Informs operational planning and risk assessment.
Propose Local Employment
LowLow effort

Include a commitment to hiring local personnel for operational roles. This aligns with general public procurement expectations for social value, even if not explicitly requested.

Enhances bid perception and potential alignment with broader public goals.
Competitive Positioning
Focus on being the most cost-effective provider without compromising on essential safety and operational standards. Highlight efficiency and lean operations to justify a highly competitive price. Emphasize reliability and a hassle-free operational experience for the Tallinn Zoo.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (4)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--The Hankepass is an initial proof of the economic operator's compliance with the contracting authority's requirements, which is filled out electronically and contains the conditions set by the contracting authority.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not involve subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm they do not involve subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
--The tender is based on the conclusion of a concession agreement.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The service is for operating a children's train attraction.
--The service will be provided on the territory of the Tallinn Zoo.
--The tenderer will be provided with the rental of the railway track and waiting pavilion.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids will be evaluated based on the total cost excluding VAT.
--The highest price is considered the best.
--The successful bid will be determined by the highest price.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308144_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.8 KB

The bidder must confirm that no subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will be involved, and joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308144_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the total cost excluding taxes, where the highest price is the best, and the winning bid will be determined by the highest price.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308144_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.2 KB

The 'Hankepass' (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration of a company's compliance with the contracting authority's requirements, to be filled electronically and containing the conditions set by the contracting authority.

RHAD - Lasterongi atraktsiooni teenuse osutamine 2026-2029DOC
RHAD - Lasterongi atraktsiooni teenuse osutam... -- 51.3 KB

The Tallinn Zoo invites bids for the provision of a children's train attraction service from 2026-2029, based on a concession agreement and in accordance with public procurement law.

RHAD Lisa 1-1 Territooriumi kaartPDF
RHAD Lisa 1-1 Territooriumi kaart.pdf -- 638.7 KB

This document contains the territory map for the Tallinn Zoo's children's train attraction, necessary for understanding the service provision conditions.

RHAD Lisa 1-2 Lasterongi asukohtPDF
RHAD Lisa 1-2 Lasterongi asukoht.pdf -- 95.8 KB

This document describes the location of the children's train at Tallinn Zoo, which is important information for understanding the service provision conditions.

RHAD Lisa 1 Tehnilised tingimusedDOC
RHAD Lisa 1 Tehnilised tingimused.docx -- 33.4 KB

The Tallinn Zoo is seeking an operator for a children's train attraction service on its premises, offering the rental of a railway track and waiting pavilion.

RHAD Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt - Lasterongi atraktsiooni teenuse osutamine 2026-202...DOC
RHAD Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt - Lasterongi atra... -- 29.7 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms for providing a children's train attraction service at the Tallinn Zoo from 2026-2029, including requirements for the leased track and train equipment.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a children's train attraction service at Tallinn Zoo is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on a concession agreement model.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard public procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the submission period. Compliance with the Public Procurement Act is explicitly stated. No immediate legal disputes or issues are flagged.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service and the location is clear. Requirements are documented, and the evaluation criteria are mentioned, although the specific weighting is not detailed in the provided snippet. Conditions for the concession agreement are implied through the contract draft.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Several key documents are attached or referenced, such as technical specifications and a contract draft. However, the specific weighting of evaluation criteria is not fully detailed.

Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and the evaluation criteria are stated to be based on relative weighting. The requirement to exclude Russian Federation-connected subcontractors is a specific geopolitical consideration rather than company-tailoring. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement. A contract start date is provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is defined. The reliance on a concession agreement model might add complexity for some bidders.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. The focus is primarily on the operational service.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Strengths

Clear description of service and location
Electronic submission and e-procurement
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value
Inclusion of contract draft and technical specifications

Concerns

Limited explicit sustainability considerations
Reliance on a concession agreement model
Weighting of evaluation criteria not fully detailed

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social benefits).
2. Provide more detailed information on the weighting of evaluation criteria.
3. Clarify any specific requirements or implications of the concession agreement model for potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline