Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of lanterns for floating navigational marks

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
308109
Value
€115,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 26, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of Poilaternad (including delivery to the address indicated by the contracting authority)100%
Total cost of Ice buoy lanterns (including delivery to the address indicated by the contracting authority)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€115,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€129,847
Avg. Bids
2.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
94%
420 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of lanterns for floating navigational marks in accordance with the conditions established in the procurement documents.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender is a price-driven procurement for navigational lanterns. The winning strategy hinges on achieving the absolute lowest price while rigorously meeting all technical specifications and eligibility criteria. Focus on cost optimization and efficient supply chain management to secure the 100% price evaluation weight.

Key Winning Messages

The Lowest Price for Uncompromised Quality: Delivering the most cost-effective solution that fully meets Riigilaevastik's technical requirements for navigational lanterns.

Reliable Supply Chain, Competitive Pricing: Leveraging efficient manufacturing and logistics to offer the lowest possible price without sacrificing product integrity or delivery timelines.

Key Opportunities
Significant opportunity to win by offering the absolute lowest price, as it carries 100% of the evaluation weight.
Opportunity to differentiate through efficient supply chain and manufacturing processes that enable aggressive pricing.
Potential to secure a long-term relationship with Riigilaevastik if the initial contract is executed flawlessly at a competitive price.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the 100% price evaluation weight, potentially leading to very thin margins.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, explore all avenues for cost reduction in manufacturing, sourcing, and logistics. Consider volume discounts from suppliers. Benchmark against known market prices for similar components.

Ensuring absolute compliance with technical specifications, as any deviation could lead to disqualification, despite the price focus.

Rigorous internal review of technical specifications against product capabilities. Engage technical experts to confirm full compliance. Prepare detailed technical data sheets and product descriptions that directly map to the tender's requirements.

The 'Hankepass' is not a document to be filled out, but an initial confirmation of self-declaration, requiring careful understanding of its purpose and format for expected responses.

Thoroughly review all tender documentation, especially sections related to submission requirements and the Hankepass. Seek clarification from the contracting authority if there is any ambiguity regarding its use and expected bidder input.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced manufacturer or distributor of marine navigational equipment with a highly optimized cost structure, proven ability to meet stringent technical specifications for LED lanterns with communication controllers and GNSS receivers, and a robust supply chain capable of delivering to Estonia. The ideal bidder will have a strong track record of delivering similar products at competitive prices.
Key Requirements
Compliance with technical specifications in Annex 1 (Poilaternad) and Annex 3 (Ice Buoy Lanterns), including LEDs, communication controller, and GNSS receiver for ice buoy lanterns.
Meeting all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, including providing technical data and proving country of production.
Submission of the lowest possible price for both Poilaternad and Ice buoy lanterns.
Adherence to delivery terms and warranty as outlined in the draft contract.
Correct completion and submission of all required documentation, including understanding the role of the Hankepass.
Key Discriminators
The absolute lowest price offered, demonstrably achieved through efficient operations and supply chain.
Flawless technical compliance with all specifications, providing assurance of product quality and performance.
A clear and concise bid submission that demonstrates a deep understanding of the tender requirements and the contracting authority's needs.
Social Value Opportunities
Given the absence of explicit social value requirements, focus on demonstrating responsible business practices through ethical sourcing and fair labor within your supply chain. While not directly evaluated, this can subtly enhance the bidder's profile.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of Poilaternad (including delivery)100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest price by optimizing manufacturing, sourcing, and logistics. Ensure all delivery costs are accurately and competitively factored in.

Total cost of Ice buoy lanterns (including delivery)100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest price. This includes the cost of LEDs, communication controller, and GNSS receiver, plus efficient delivery. Leverage bulk purchasing for components if possible.

Recommendations5
Aggressively Price to Win
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% price weighting, the primary focus must be on submitting the absolute lowest possible price for both product categories. Conduct a detailed cost-down exercise for all components and processes. Explore all options for economies of scale and supplier negotiation.

Directly determines the winning bid.
Ensure 100% Technical Specification Compliance
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review Annex 1 and Annex 3. Any non-compliance, however minor, can lead to disqualification. Prepare detailed technical documentation that clearly demonstrates adherence to all specified requirements, including the specific components for ice buoy lanterns (LEDs, communication controller, GNSS receiver).

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Clarify Hankepass Usage
HighLow effort

Understand the precise role and expected format of responses related to the Hankepass. If there is any ambiguity, proactively seek clarification from Riigilaevastik to avoid submission errors.

Ensures a compliant and correctly formatted submission.
Verify Country of Production Documentation
HighLow effort

Ensure all necessary documentation to prove the country of production is readily available and compliant with the tender requirements. This is a key eligibility criterion.

Avoids exclusion based on eligibility.
Optimize Delivery Costs
MediumMed effort

Since delivery costs are included in the total price evaluation, ensure these are accurately calculated and minimized. Explore efficient shipping routes and logistics partners to Estonia.

Contributes to the overall lowest price.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the essential technical requirements. Emphasize the bidder's ability to deliver high-quality, compliant products at the lowest market price, leveraging efficient operations and a streamlined supply chain.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

109 requirements across 10 categories

Submission (93)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (8)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids will be evaluated solely based on price.
--The tender documents include general conditions for the procurement procedure and submission requirements.
--The contract draft outlines the terms of delivery and warranty.
ESITAMISE NOUDED89
--Pakkumuste hindamisel on oluline vaid hind.
--Hankedokumendid sisaldavad hankemenetluse üldtingimusi ja esitamise nõudeid.
--Hankelepingu projekt kirjeldab kauba tarnimist ja garantiid.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must comply with the conditions set out by the contracting authority.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must meet the compliance conditions specified by the contracting authority.
--Bidders must provide technical data.
--Bidders must prove the country of production.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The lanterns must meet the technical specifications outlined in Annex 1 (Poilaternad) and Annex 3 (Ice Buoy Lanterns).
--Ice buoy lanterns must include LEDs, a communication controller, and a GNSS receiver.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The lowest price will receive 100% of the evaluation weight.
KOHUSTUSLIKUD NOUDED1
--Pakkujad peavad täitma hankija poolt sätestatud tingimusi.
VASTAVUSNOUDED4
--Pakkujad peavad täitma vastavustingimusi.
--Pakkujad peavad esitama tehnilised andmed.
--Pakkujad peavad tõendama tootmisriiki.
TEHNILISED NOUDED2
--Laternatel peavad vastama Lisa 1 (Poilaternad) ja Lisa 3 (Jääpoilaternad) tehnilistele kirjeldustele.
--Jääpoilaternad peavad sisaldama valgusdioode, sidekontrollerit ja GNSS-vastuvõtjat.
FINANTSNOUDED1
--Madalaim hind saab 100% kaalu.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308109_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 15.7 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to comply with the conditions of conformity, including submitting technical data, proving the country of manufacture, and adhering to participation restrictions, to ensure compliance with the procurement requirements for floating navigation mark lanterns.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308109_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.2 KB

The contracting authority Riigilaevastik is purchasing lanterns for floating navigation marks, where only price is the evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving 100% weight.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308109_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.4 KB

The 'Hankepass' is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion.

Riigihanke alusdokumendid üldosaDOC
1_Riigihanke alusdokumendid üldosa.doc -- 88.5 KB

The general part of the tender documents outlines the general terms and submission requirements for the procurement of floating navigation mark lanterns.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus PoilaternadDOC
2_Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus Poilaternad.doc -- 195.0 KB

The Estonian Maritime Administration is purchasing lanterns for floating navigational marks, with technical specifications provided in Appendix 1.

Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus JääpoilaternadDOC
3_Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus Jääpoilaternad.d... -- 154.4 KB

This technical specification defines requirements for ice buoy lanterns used for navigation marks in freezing seas, including LED light sources, a communication controller, and a GNSS receiver.

Lisa 3 Hankelepingu projektDOC
4_Lisa 3 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 45.7 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms for the purchase of floating navigation mark lanterns, including delivery and warranty conditions.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for floating navigation mark lanterns is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation based on price. However, it lacks explicit details on contract duration and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are provided and seem reasonable given the submission deadline. No disputes are noted. The procedure type 'A' is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, and the technical requirements are detailed in annexes. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as price-based. Conditions for submission and contract terms are referenced in the documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and organization. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated, which is a notable omission. Key documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are available.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is fair as it allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). E-procurement is utilized. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. A document URL for the opening place is provided. Financing information and contract start date are not explicitly detailed, impacting practicality. The duration of the contract is missing.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code is provided.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which limits the scope for sustainability considerations.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications in annexes
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Use of e-procurement
Disclosure of estimated value

Concerns

Missing contract duration
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Missing contract start date and financing information

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract duration clearly.
2. Incorporate sustainability criteria or acknowledge their absence.
3. Provide details on financing and contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline