Skip to main content
Tenders

Diversion of sewage in Puti residential area, Eametsa village, Tori municipality

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
308099
Value
€176,250
Location
Estonia
Published
March 26, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the diversion of the Puti residential area's communal sewerage100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Tender Opening

April 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€176,250
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement contract is the diversion of the communal sewage system in the Puti residential area, Eametsa village, Tori municipality, in accordance with the tender documentation. The procurement contract includes: - approx. 25 m of gravity sewage pipeline; - approx. 43 m of pressure sewage pipeline; - 2 sewage pumping stations (including electricity and automation), electricity connection to be provided by the Contracting Authority; - dismantling of old sewage pumping stations and pipelines; - restoration.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The bid must be submitted electronically in the designated e-procurement environment according to the provided structure.
--The contracting authority may conduct negotiations with bidders regarding the tender documents and the bid price.
--The contracting authority uses a reverse procedure in this tender according to RHS §52 sec 3.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must provide evidence that they have not fallen under exclusion grounds, including penalties, tax debts, or previous breaches of public procurement contracts.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must meet qualification conditions.
--Bidders must submit explanations regarding trade secrets.
--Bidders must confirm the submission of the bid price according to requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a list of similar construction works performed in the last 60 months according to Form KII.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid price must be submitted according to requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308099_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.0 KB

Bidders must provide explanations regarding trade secrets and confirm the submission of the bid price according to requirements, submit a bid notice, and if applicable, a power of attorney for joint bidders.

Pakkuja (iga ühispakkuja) kinnitus kõrvaldamise aluste puudumise kohta (Vorm KI)DOC
Vorm KI.doc -- 26.0 KB

The bidder must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds by submitting Form KI.

Pakkuja poolt viimase 60 kuu jooksul teostatud sarnaste ehitustööde loetelu (Vor...DOC
Vorm KII.doc -- 33.5 KB

Bidders must submit a list of similar construction works performed in the last 60 months according to Form KII.

Esitada pakkumusteade (Vorm PI)DOC
Vorm PI.doc -- 29.0 KB

Bidders must submit the bid notice form PI, which is part of the tender documents.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308099_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

The tender evaluates the total cost of the bid, where the lowest price receives the maximum score, to determine the winner for the wastewater diversion project in Tori municipality.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
308099_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 9.1 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to provide confirmation of no exclusion grounds, including criminal convictions, tax arrears, or prior contract breaches, and to meet qualification criteria.

LepingDOC
Puti ühiskanalisatsiooni ehitusleping.docx -- 29.3 KB

This document is the general part of a construction works contract, defining the parties to the contract and their representatives, and is part of the tender documentation.

Ühispakkujate volikiri (Vorm PII)DOC
Vorm PII.doc -- 31.0 KB

The Joint Bidders' Power of Attorney (Form PII) is a required document that confirms the authority of joint bidder members to represent the joint bid in the procurement procedure.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for wastewater infrastructure in Tori municipality is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a standard e-procurement process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of submission could be clearer.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements for public procurement in Estonia, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. The use of a reverse procedure is a specific legal mechanism that is clearly stated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, detailing the scope of pipe laying, pump stations, and demolition. The AI-extracted requirements and document summaries provide a good overview of what is expected from bidders. The evaluation criteria are stated as 'relative_weighting', which is a standard but could be more specific.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and duration. However, the financing condition is only referenced within the contract terms, and the specific start date of the contract is not explicitly stated, only the tender validity period.

Financing condition is referenced but not detailed.
Specific contract start date is not explicitly mentioned.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, with full document access implied. The estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for determining the winner in case of equal points (drawing lots) is a point of potential concern for fairness, though it is a legally permissible method. The right to reject all bids if prices are too high is standard but can impact bidder confidence.

Winner determination by drawing lots in case of equal points.
Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, which is positive. However, the specific structure for electronic submission is only mentioned as being visible during bid preparation, which could be more explicitly detailed beforehand. The financing condition is not directly provided in the tender documents, requiring bidders to refer to contract terms.

Specific electronic submission structure could be more explicitly detailed.
Financing details are only referenced in contract terms.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The tender validity period of 3 months aligns with typical procurement timelines.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This is a significant area for improvement to align with modern public procurement standards.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical description of works
Standard e-procurement process
Well-defined exclusion and eligibility criteria
CPV code and location clearly specified

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Winner determination by drawing lots in case of equal points
Financing conditions only referenced in contract terms

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility).
2. Provide more detail on the electronic submission structure and financing conditions within the tender documents.
3. Consider alternative tie-breaking mechanisms to drawing lots for equal points.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline