Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Lift upgrade in H-block

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
308094
Value
€110,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 26, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 23, 2026

Tender Opening

April 23, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€110,000
Duration
30 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of this procurement is to replace the existing worn-out lift in the H-block of SA Ida-Viru Central Hospital (IVKH) with a new modern lift. The H-block is located at Tervise tn 1, Ahtme district, Kohtla-Järve city.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender is a straightforward lift replacement project with a single evaluation criterion: lowest price. Success hinges on aggressive pricing while ensuring all mandatory requirements are met. Bidders should focus on cost optimization and efficient execution to secure this contract.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and reliable lift replacement solution for IVKH's H-building.

Key Opportunities
Sole evaluation criterion is price, allowing for direct competitive advantage through aggressive bidding.
Limited complexity in technical requirements and no explicit social/green procurement mandates, simplifying bid preparation.
Opportunity to leverage existing supplier relationships for cost reductions on lift components and installation.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the sole evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost savings in materials, labor, and overhead. Explore volume discounts with suppliers. Consider lean project management methodologies.

Risk of underbidding and impacting profitability or quality.

Perform detailed cost breakdowns for every stage of the project. Include contingency for unforeseen issues, but ensure it doesn't inflate the price beyond competitiveness. Focus on efficient execution to maintain margins.

Ensuring all mandatory submission requirements are met precisely to avoid disqualification.

Implement a rigorous bid review process. Assign a dedicated bid manager to oversee all documentation and form submissions. Double-check all required forms (Vorm 1, Vorm_3_Volitus_ühispakkujad.doc, Vorm_2_Volikiri.doc) and ESPD completion.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized lift installation and maintenance company with a proven track record in public sector projects, capable of delivering high-quality work at a competitive price. The ideal bidder will have streamlined operational costs and efficient supply chain management to offer the lowest possible bid.
Key Requirements
Submission of application for participation according to Form 1
Compliance with tender conditions and eligibility requirements
Accurate and lowest total bid cost
Technical capability for lift renovation (dismantling, installation)
Power of attorney if applicable (Form_3_Volitus_ühispakkujad.doc, Vorm_2_Volikiri.doc)
Key Discriminators
The ability to offer a slightly longer warranty period or a more comprehensive maintenance package at a competitive price, even if not explicitly evaluated, can be a subtle differentiator if the price is very close.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a mandatory requirement, consider including a brief statement about commitment to local employment or waste reduction during installation, presented as an added value rather than a cost driver.
Bid Focus Areas
Total bid cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest price possible through meticulous cost engineering, efficient project planning, and leveraging supplier relationships. Ensure the bid is competitive enough to secure maximum points.

Recommendations5
Aggressive Price Optimization
CriticalHigh effort

Focus all efforts on achieving the lowest possible bid price. This involves detailed cost analysis, negotiating with suppliers for bulk discounts on lift components, and optimizing labor costs through efficient scheduling and resource allocation. The goal is to be the lowest bidder to secure 100% of the evaluation score.

Directly impacts the win probability by securing maximum points for the sole evaluation criterion.
Meticulous Form and Document Submission
CriticalMed effort

Ensure all required forms (Vorm 1, ESPD, and any applicable power of attorney forms) are completed accurately and submitted within the deadline. A single error can lead to disqualification. Implement a thorough internal review process for all submitted documents.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Cost Breakdown and Contingency Planning
HighMed effort

Develop a detailed cost breakdown for all project components (materials, labor, installation, testing, commissioning). Include a realistic but lean contingency for unforeseen issues, ensuring it doesn't compromise the bid's competitiveness. This also helps in managing project costs if awarded.

Ensures profitability while maintaining a competitive bid and managing project risks.
Supplier Negotiation and Lead Time Management
HighMed effort

Engage with lift component suppliers early to secure the best possible pricing and confirm lead times. Understanding and managing lead times is crucial for timely installation and adherence to the contract duration.

Secures cost savings and ensures project timeline adherence.
Value-Added Service (Optional)
LowLow effort

If the price is extremely competitive, consider offering a slightly extended warranty period or a basic post-installation support package. This should not add significant cost but can be a subtle differentiator if multiple bids are very close in price.

May provide a slight edge in extremely close bids.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most economically advantageous offer, emphasizing cost-effectiveness without compromising on the essential technical requirements. Highlight efficiency in execution to reassure the client of timely completion at the lowest price.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (2)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit an application for participation according to the provided form (Vorm 1).
--Submit a power of attorney if applicable (Vorm_3_Volitus_ühispakkujad.doc for joint bidders, Vorm_2_Volikiri.doc for representatives).
--Submit the bid cost according to instructions.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bidder must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Submit an application for participation.
--Submit a power of attorney if applicable (for joint bidders or representatives).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender involves lift renovation in H-building.
--Technical requirements include dismantling, installation of a new lift, and execution conditions.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total cost of the bid will be the sole evaluation criterion.
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score.
--The estimated value of the tender is 110,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308094_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.7 KB

The bidder must confirm compliance with tender conditions, submit an application for participation and a power of attorney (if applicable), visit the site, and provide the bid price according to instructions.

Pakkuja esitab hankemenetluses osalemise avalduse vastavalt lisatud vormile (Vor...DOC
Vorm_1_Hankemenetluses_osalemise avaldus_.doc -- 37.5 KB

To participate in the tender procedure, an application must be submitted according to the attached form (Form 1).

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308094_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

In the tender "Lift renovation in H-building", bids are evaluated solely on total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308094_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.3 KB

The tender pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

HAD_Lisa-1_Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
HAD_Lisa_1_hankeobjekti_tehniline_kirjeldus.d... -- 24.7 KB

This tender document outlines the technical requirements for the H-building elevator upgrade, including dismantling, installation of a new elevator, and work execution conditions.

HAD_Lisa_2_Hankelepingu_vormDOC
HAD_Lisa_2_Hankelepingu_vorm.docx -- 29.1 KB

This document is a form of construction work contract that outlines the terms, deadlines, and price for an elevator renovation project.

HAD_üldosaDOC
HAD_uldosa.doc -- 54.5 KB

This general document outlines the tender conditions and requirements for the elevator renovation project at Sihtasutus Ida-Viru Keskhaigla's H-building.

Vorm_2_VolikiriDOC
Vorm_2_Volikiri.doc -- 25.0 KB

Submit a power of attorney that proves the representative's right to represent the bidder in the procurement procedure.

Vorm_3_Volitus_ühispakkujadDOC
Vorm_3_Volitus_ühispakkujad.doc -- 25.5 KB

This document is a power of attorney required for joint bidders to confirm their legal representation in the procurement procedure.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for lift renovation in H-building is generally well-structured with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific details on technical capabilities and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type 'A' (Open procedure) is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's objective is clear. Requirements for participation and technical specifications are documented. Evaluation criteria are specified, although the sole reliance on price might be a concern for quality.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications and contract forms are attached. However, detailed exclusion grounds and specific technical capability requirements are not explicitly detailed in the provided snippets.

Lack of explicit detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
Fairness85/100

The tender is accessible electronically, and the estimated value is disclosed. The evaluation criterion is based on total cost, which is objective. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is facilitated. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The contract duration is specified.

Contract start date not specified.
Financing information not provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical and consistent. No suspensions or disputes are noted.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear financial information and estimated value.
Reasonable submission and opening deadlines.
Electronic submission and e-procurement facilitated.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Absence of contract start date and financing details.
Limited detail on specific technical capability requirements beyond general scope.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria into the evaluation or technical requirements.
2. Provide clarity on the contract start date and financing sources.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline