Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction works in Kehtna municipality and surrounding areas 2026

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
308092
Value
€1,904,300
Location
Estonia
Published
March 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of construction works in Kehtna municipality and surrounding areas 2026100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 23, 2026

Tender Opening

April 23, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,904,300
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction works in Kehtna municipality and surrounding areas 2026 in accordance with the conditions set out in the public procurement tender documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Kehtna municipality road works prioritizes cost-effectiveness, requiring a highly competitive price. Bidders must demonstrate robust technical capability in road construction and meticulous attention to detail in cost breakdown, while leveraging the 'Green Procurement' aspect for differentiation.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective Excellence: Delivering high-quality road construction at the most competitive price.

Sustainable Roadways: Commitment to environmentally responsible construction practices.

Reliable Execution: Proven capability to deliver within the specified timeframe and technical standards.

Key Opportunities
Leverage 'Green Procurement' for differentiation, even if not explicitly scored. Highlighting sustainable material choices or waste reduction strategies can appeal to the contracting authority's stated objective.
Thoroughly analyze and optimize the cost breakdown (HD IV Kululoend.xlsx). Given the 'lowest price' evaluation, granular detail and efficiency in cost estimation are paramount.
Demonstrate a clear understanding and capability to meet the technical specifications outlined in HD III Teetööde kirjeldus.docx. This is a foundational requirement for any successful bid.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the 'lowest price' evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify areas for efficiency gains without compromising quality, and consider strategic pricing that balances competitiveness with profitability. Explore economies of scale or optimized resource allocation.

Potential for disqualification due to non-compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds or eligibility requirements.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submission documents, especially the Hankepass (ESPD) and subcontractor background checks. Ensure all mandatory fields are completed accurately and all supporting evidence is readily available.

The short duration of 4 months for the contract may pose logistical and resource management challenges.

Develop a detailed project execution plan that clearly outlines resource allocation, scheduling, and risk management strategies to ensure timely completion. Highlight past experience with similar short-duration projects.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced road construction company with a proven track record in public sector tenders, possessing strong cost management capabilities, a commitment to sustainable practices, and the ability to deliver high-quality road works efficiently within a tight timeframe.
Key Requirements
Compliance with technical requirements for road works (HD III Teetööde kirjeldus.docx)
Accurate and detailed cost breakdown (HD IV Kululoend.xlsx)
Confirmation of agreement with tender conditions and eligibility requirements
Background checks and explanations for subcontractors (Mandatory Exclusion Grounds)
Adherence to Green Procurement principles
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated commitment to sustainable construction practices beyond minimum requirements, aligning with the 'Green Procurement' aspect.
Exceptional clarity and detail in the cost breakdown, showcasing a deep understanding of project economics and potential efficiencies.
Proactive risk identification and mitigation strategies presented within the bid, particularly concerning project timeline and subcontractor management.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to utilizing local suppliers for materials where feasible, contributing to the local economy of Kehtna municipality. Quantify this commitment if possible (e.g., 'aim to source X% of materials locally').
Bid Focus Areas
CostMaximum Score for Lowest Price

Achieve the lowest possible price through meticulous cost breakdown, efficiency optimization, and competitive sourcing. Ensure no hidden costs or omissions that could lead to claims later.

Technical Capability

Clearly demonstrate compliance with all technical specifications in HD III Teetööde kirjeldus.docx. Provide evidence of past successful road construction projects of similar scope and complexity.

Green Procurement

Integrate and highlight sustainable practices in the bid proposal, even if not a direct scoring criterion. This can be a qualitative differentiator.

Recommendations5
Master the Cost Breakdown
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant effort to meticulously populate and optimize the HD IV Kululoend.xlsx. Ensure all general costs are considered, and identify opportunities for cost savings through efficient planning and resource utilization. Benchmark against similar projects if possible.

Directly impacts the scoring for the primary evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Proactive Subcontractor Due Diligence
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly vet all proposed subcontractors for mandatory exclusion grounds. Prepare clear explanations and supporting evidence for any potential concerns, ensuring a seamless background check process for the contracting authority.

Prevents disqualification based on mandatory exclusion grounds.
Integrate Green Procurement Commitments
HighMed effort

While not explicitly scored, actively incorporate and highlight sustainable practices in the bid narrative. This could include using recycled materials, minimizing waste, or employing energy-efficient equipment. Frame these as value-adds.

Enhances the bid's appeal and aligns with the contracting authority's stated objectives, potentially influencing qualitative aspects of evaluation or future considerations.
Rigorous Compliance Check
HighMed effort

Conduct a comprehensive internal review of the entire bid submission against all tender requirements, including eligibility, technical, and submission criteria. Pay close attention to the Hankepass (ESPD) and any accompanying documentation.

Minimizes the risk of administrative errors leading to disqualification.
Develop a Robust Project Execution Plan
MediumMed effort

Given the 4-month duration, outline a clear and achievable project execution plan that addresses resource allocation, scheduling, and potential bottlenecks. This demonstrates preparedness and capability for timely delivery.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver on time and within scope.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-efficient provider without compromising on quality or sustainability. Emphasize lean operations and optimized resource management to justify a competitive price.
Highlight a strong understanding of local context and environmental considerations, aligning with the 'Green Procurement' aspect and demonstrating a commitment to Kehtna municipality's development.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--The main document of the public procurement contains the contracting authority's data, a description of the procurement procedure, and the grounds for exclusion of bidders and qualification conditions, which can be found in the e-procurement environment.
--The reason why the contracting authority does not divide the procurement into lots is stated in point 1.6 of the main document of the public procurement.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority checks the background of subcontractors for criminal offenses and fraud, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must explain trade secrets, if applicable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Technical requirements for road works in Kehtna municipality and its surroundings for 2026 are described in the document HD III Teetoode kirjeldus.docx.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids will be evaluated based on cost, where the lowest price will receive the maximum score.
--The cost breakdown document HD IV Kululoend.xlsx contains details of general costs to be considered in the bid for construction works in Kehtna municipality and its surroundings.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
308092_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 29.9 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for criminal offenses and fraud, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
308092_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender conditions, submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel, and explain any business secrets if applicable.

HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV Kululoend.xlsx -- 40.5 KB

This document outlines a cost breakdown for general expenses to be considered in the tender for construction works in Kehtna municipality and its surroundings.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308092_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

In the tender "Construction works in Kehtna municipality and surrounding areas 2026", bids are evaluated based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308092_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.6 KB

The tender pass is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as initial proof of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, but it is not filled out directly.

HD III Teetööde kirjeldusDOC
HD III Teetoode kirjeldus.docx -- 4.5 MB

This document outlines the technical requirements for road construction works in Kehtna municipality and its surroundings for the year 2026.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 34.2 KB

The tender's foundational document contains the contracting authority's details, procurement procedure description, and bidder exclusion grounds and qualification conditions, all available on the e-procurement platform.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction works in Kehtna municipality is generally well-structured, with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit details on social and innovation aspects, and some document formats are not easily accessible for automated analysis.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the provision of a CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The procedure type 'A' (Open procedure) is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is concise, referring to detailed documents for specific requirements. Key criteria like cost-based evaluation are mentioned. The conditions for participation and exclusion grounds are outlined, contributing to overall clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the reliance on external documents for technical specifications and contract details, some of which are in non-AI-readable formats (.zip), slightly impacts completeness.

Some essential tender documents are in .zip format, hindering automated analysis and potentially accessibility for some bidders.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the evaluation is based on objective criteria (lowest price). The value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. There are no overtly tailored requirements to specific companies. Access to documents is generally provided through the e-procurement platform.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement, which are practical. However, the contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and the duration is relatively short (4 months), which might limit the scope for certain types of construction works. Financing information is not detailed.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Limited detail on financing.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are consistent and follow a logical progression.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive indicator. However, there are no specific details or requirements related to social aspects, innovation, or explicit EU funding mentioned, limiting the score in this category.

Lack of specific social criteria.
No explicit mention of innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear financial information and estimated value.
Well-defined e-procurement process.
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Reasonable submission and opening deadlines.
Inclusion of 'Green Procurement' characteristic.

Concerns

Some tender documents are in non-AI-readable formats (.zip).
Lack of explicit contract start date.
Limited detail on sustainability aspects beyond 'Green Procurement'.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are provided in accessible formats for automated analysis.
2. Specify the contract start date for greater clarity.
3. Elaborate on specific sustainability, social, or innovation requirements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline