Skip to main content
Tenders

Maintenance and upkeep of public playgrounds and sports fields in Narva city in 2026

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
308083
Value
€40,900
Location
Estonia
Published
March 24, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€40,900
Duration
7 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the public procurement is the maintenance and upkeep of public playgrounds and sports fields (hereinafter referred to as fields) in Narva city, including the purchase of spare parts and materials necessary for maintenance.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-07 09:00:00.
--The Hankepass is the entrepreneur's own confirmation, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
--The document 'vastavustingimused.pdf' clarifies the power of attorney for joint bidders, conditions for submitting a bid, submission of cost, and requirements for equivalence.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority has the right to check for the absence of grounds for exclusion and qualification only from the successful bidder (so-called reverse procedure).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The contracting authority reserves the right to apply the provisions of § 52 sec. 3 of the Public Procurement Act.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The technical specification defines the requirements for maintenance and repair services of public playgrounds and sports fields in Narva, including regular maintenance, emergency calls, and repair work, which will be paid based on a fixed monthly fee and unit prices.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender value is 40900.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated solely on the basis of cost, where the lowest price will receive 100 points, and other bids will receive points proportionally.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308083_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.5 KB

This document outlines the requirements for joint bidder authorization, bid submission conditions, cost presentation, and equivalency for the maintenance and upkeep of Narva city's public playgrounds and sports fields tender.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308083_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids solely based on cost, where the lowest bid receives 100 points, and other bids receive points proportionally.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308083_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 39.3 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Lisa 2. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus (Narva avalike las... -- 73.9 KB

This technical specification outlines the requirements for the maintenance and upkeep of Narva city's public playgrounds and sports fields, including regular maintenance, emergency call-outs, and repair works, compensated by a fixed monthly fee and unit prices.

Lisa 3. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 3 TVL_LMA_Mänguväljakud_eelnõu.docx -- 33.6 KB

This document is a draft contract for the maintenance and upkeep of Narva city's public playgrounds and sports fields, outlining the parties to the contract and their obligations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for playground and sports field maintenance in Narva is generally well-structured, with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on a reverse procedure for qualification checks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to most legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadlines appear reasonable for the scope of the tender. The reliance on a reverse procedure for qualification checks is a common practice but could be perceived as slightly less transparent than upfront checks.

Clarity80/100

The description of the services is clear, and the requirements for maintenance and repair are documented in the technical specification. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with cost being the sole factor. Conditions for bid submission are outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the financing condition is general ('Narva city budget'), and while contract duration is specified, the exact start date is not explicitly stated, impacting the overall completeness.

Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The value is disclosed, and the criteria are objective (lowest price). The reverse procedure for qualification checks, while common, means that not all bidders are subjected to the same level of scrutiny upfront, which is a minor point against absolute fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender supports e-submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. However, the absence of a specific contract start date and the general financing condition reduce practicality. The reliance on specific document formats for some submissions (e.g., .xml, .xls) might pose challenges for some bidders.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated consistently. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical within the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which limits its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social responsibility criteria.

Strengths

Clear description of services and technical requirements.
E-submission and e-procurement enabled.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Reliance on reverse procedure for qualification checks.
General financing condition without specific details.
Potential format compatibility issues for some submission documents.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., use of eco-friendly materials, waste reduction) into the evaluation.
2. Consider upfront qualification checks for all bidders to enhance transparency and fairness.
3. Provide more specific details on the financing mechanism or source.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline